Stefl1504 said:
1) Yes, I expected more people to jump on me, but that does not mean that I claimed there is a lynch train on me. @underline, no, that is not what I would call sufficiant, I am still waiting on me saying, "guys there is a lynch train going on on me, stop it" or something similar. 2) @italic, you should reread, and comprehend, then do it over and over again, until you do see what I really posted, then reread and comprehend what you said and then, try to analyse again. Because I agreed on you that roles are weaker than others, but added to that, that every role can be equally usefull to your team, which you then interpreted as putting words in your mouth, which I didn't. If a player with comprehensive abilities comes too the same result upon reading this, I will retract this statement openly, admiting that I was in the wrong and put words into your mouth. Also, read the italic part again, it should also be comprehended better by you. 3) @bitalic, yes, I indeed needed the time to get my responses to a normal, contributive level again. Please point out slip-ups, I am interpreting this that I have made some while I was raging like a two-year-old not getting a lolly. (If I am misinterpreting, please point it out, I don't want to put words in your mouth) I sadly have no QT, otherwise I would rage in there instead of in here. 4) @bold, yes, my FoS was 4 days earlier, it still held value though, and it was actually the reason why I voted you again today, because while I was searching for your vote on radish, I noticed it once again. 5) Finally, please, answer about radish, and don't just ignore the inconvinient parts. |
1) - Dont expect that post because you never gave it and you know it. My point still stands though, you mentioned a lynch train on yourself like you were seriously considering it 3 times in half an hour. I call that sufficient, and clearly Zero thought the same.
2) I have already stated it was not my strongest point. You did put change the meaning of my phrases, or feign ignorance as to what I meant several times in that converstaion bit, meaning i had to clarify 3 or 4 times though.
3) No- that is not at all what I am saying. I am saying your rage was mostly a sham to get yourself banned. This was to stop you making slip ups when i started to question you.
4) So you noticed it once again when looking through... clearly that was so important that you remembered it, considering that your revenge vote on me was only 1 day ago. Funny, that you can remember it for 4 days and start a vote when I am barely interacting with you- but when we are clashing all the time and i am at the front of your mind- you forget it.
5) I believe I didn't ignore anything. The only bit I did was the Radish part and that's because i thought it was a joke. I did a huge couple of posts about Radish. I kept him on my scum list throughout as well. It was not just left there for convienience. It is hardly inconvient to put a new line and write unvote.
So hyped for Rome 2: Total War