Shambolic on 05 February 2008
mr-money - That's a strange conclusion to reach; the government have the power to declare a martial law dictatorship that could lead to heavily armed policemen using violence against its citizens and you want guns to defend against them rather than taking other measures to prevent this? Other than having guns as a preventative measure that is.
Whatever side of the gun debate someone is on that just seems like an odd take on the need for guns and possible abuses of power by a government.
