TruckOSaurus said: @Stefl: Your reasons for suspecting Final-Fan are ridiculous and go against what I've come to expect from him. FF posts less as scum not more. |
I guess I'm the only one that thinks FF doesn't post much early on regardless of his alignment, and it's only in later days when his activity can be used as a tell.
Just because FF has a crusdae already to sink his "fangs" into doesn't mean that "unnatural high activity" is inapplicable. FF could have come into the thread and simply voted with something along the lines of "said I'd do it in the sign-ups" and been mostly quiet for the rest of the day. I don't agree that the change in playstyle is suspicious though, because like I said two rounds ago, werid/unnatural is a bad indicator of being scum. However, Stefl does say that it's not enough to push for a lynch, so unlike you that was redeeming to me.
RolStoppable said:
If we all went for "no lynch" on Day 1, then the only information we would have on Day 2 would be the people who died during Night 1 and that isn't necessarily much. By trying to find a candidate for a lynch on Day 1, even if it is a mislynch, we have discussions to look back on that can help us to determine who is scum. |
We'd probably have more than just who died Night 1, but yes Day 1 can be a gold mine.
morenoingrato said:
Okay, that's it. Unvote. Vote: Radishhead. You suspect ToS because he doesn't suspect you, that's... laughable. |
What happened to all the analysis of last game, Mr. Trigger-Happy?
nen-suer said:
Kiryu is one of hat favourite characters so there is a very good chance of him being here thats why i belive stefl. I agree with you about Trucks, he's too quite and we all know how he hates bing mafia. And this is true also for Linkz. |
Wait.. I hate being mafia or I'm quite(:P) as mafia?
Why are you so focused on my absence? This makes twice you've mentioned me, but you say nothing of Wonk, Noctis, prof, or Baalz who were all at best as active as me.