IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
Which is why I'm sure everyone would prefer choosing another host once the first one quit. But as things look now, giving both teams one loss each is better than giving both teams nothing as the host could just quit if being in the losing team, which makes him avoid a loss. |
I would say that is debatable.
Having the game choose another host and have the game play out as it normally would is a much better solution than the host backing out, everybody gets a loss and no stats from the game are recorded. If the original host were to back out, he still gets a loss and his stats aren't recorded. The only difference is only he is affected by the back out, not everybody.