| gameonbro said: blame it on xbox not the company... RAGE runs 60fps on the 360 30 on ps3 blame the 360 for slowing it down lol... |
Either my sarcasm meter is completely off, or you just have no idea what you're talking about...
http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-rage-analysis/
Performance: The performance aspect of RAGE is a little more one sided. Both versions of the game managed to play the game with minimal screen tearing, so we have good news there. For the most part both versions also played with a frame rate very close to the targeted sixty frames per second. The difference between these two versions boils down to when shit hits the fan in heavy fire fights. Neither version tears in these events, however the 360 version suffers from a noticeable drop in frame rate. The PS3 with a partial install was able to manage a solid sixty frames per second when things got heavy, but the 360 version dropped anywhere from ten to fifteen frames under pressure. The good news is that even at forty-five frames per second, the motions never really seem choppy. When you get right down to it though, the PS3 version is a smoother experience with a solid sixty frames per second in all situations, giving Sony the edge they need to strike back by taking the performance category.
