adriane23 said:
-Newcloud- said:
adriane23 said:
oniyide said:
No More Heroes, for a long time i kept hearing about this "amazing" game for Wii. Other games i wanted kept getting in the way so i never got around to getting it. PS3 version was announced, so i said WTH might as well wait for the version with extra stuff and get the sequel on Wii. Finally played it(PSN demo version) and man im I glad I never got the game. It is not good. You run down corridors beating up boring enemies with boring gameplay. The bosses look interesting, but there not all that either. I cant figure out how people gave this game high scores. Did they drop their standards because its on Wii and they didnt expect much, or was it pity points??
Crysis2, was going to get day one, but decided to get KZ3 instead. Glad I did. Crysis2 is a good game, but not 9,0 good. Too many glitches for that. Are people just throwing high scores at games for the hell of it?? Sure the graphics are good, but that means nothing when the character design is bland and the enemies get stuck it place. KZ3 has great graphics and nary a glitch in sight |
I did the exact same thing for both No More Heroes AND Crysis 2.
I'd also have to say Fallout. Post Apocalyptic games just seem so boring and lazy to me. Hey explore this desolate turd/vomit colored world and shoot mutant meat monsters who are either wearing overalls, leather, or completely naked!!!!
|
I wish I passed on No More Heroes, that game is and i'll say it. F**KING AWFUL :P
|
It's sad because I was SOOOOOOOOOOO hyped for it when it was announced that it was going multiplat. Nintendo could've kept that bullshit.
|
same here, i was excited, gonna be day 1 for me. But damn it wasnt that great. The only reason why it was so hyped on Wii, is because it was one of the few M rated games and it was exclusive. Had it been multiplat from day 1 it would have gotten the attention is actually deserved
