ZaneWane said:
osamanobama said:
ZaneWane said:
osamanobama said:
ZaneWane said:
Aldro said:
ZaneWane said:
IGN and many like it have spoken
|
IGN :'D, check out MGS4 beating Crysis Warhead in graphic awards
http://bestof.ign.com/2008/overall/11.html
Damn bro! Considering Crysis Warhead being on the PC and without DX 11 -> is far better than Crysis 2..
MGS4 IS GRAPHICALLY BETTER THAN CRYSIS 2!
Ign confirms and so did 30 other sites if my memory serves me right!
|
My sig does not lie
|
do you realize only one quote from your sig claims crysis 2 is graphics kings.
and do you realize both Digital Foundry and lens of truth proved killzone look better.
didnt we already go over this 6 month ago when you found out crysis 2 is SD, screen tear, framerate drop nightmare
|
IGN and many like it were talking about looks not performance
|
yeah, i dont really want to get into this so i will be done after this post.
but ign isnt credible at all when it comes to analizing graphics. for example the said Mass effect 2 on ps3 was superior graphically to the xbox version.
also Crysis isnt even 720p. and screen tearing and performance has a ton to do with graphics. Battlefield 3 could probably be 1080p if it wanted to but, very other frame would be torn and it would be runing at 10 fps, with the stupidest AI ever
|
Again you are talking performance not looks
|
im talking both they go hand in hand, read my last paragraph.
also read Digital foundry, and find out Crysis 2 resolution and it mediocre temperal AA. this is silly now.
