By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sapphi_snake on 02 August 2011
Edit Thread
d21lewis said:
Fayceless said:
 

As I stated earlier, they could have found her guilty of manslaughter, but chose not to on a lack of evidence.


They tried aggravated manslaughter.  They could have gone with voluntary or involuntary manslaughter.  There's a difference. Probably would have stood a better chance.  Even then, the big question is how did Caylee die?  Even now, with mom dodging a bullet, there is still no way of knowing exactly how the little girl died.

It just racks my brain.  Mom waited so long to tell someone (she probably NEVER would have said anything), the girl is found in the woods, and she lies about everything and everyone related to the incident (my kid is with the nanny. my kid is in the park. the nanny has kidnapped my kid and lets me talk to her on the phone. etc. etc. etc.).  I just don't get it.

Well, maybe if she hadn't left the little girl's corpse to rot in a swamp, they could've established the cause of death in an autopsy.



"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"

"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."

                                                                               (The Voice of a Generation and Seece)

"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"

                                                                               (pizzahut451)