richardhutnik on 11 June 2011
| alfredofroylan said:
What about ... no.http://e3.gamespot.com/story/6318951/e3-2011-microsoft-incorporating-kinect-into-all-first-party-games |
How about your wishing things not be having NO impact on reality, and they do what they feel that the market needs is best? WHY is it an issue, if it is OPTIONAL but ENHANCES the experience? I see one side want to have reasons for Kinect being needed. But the, someone else is going to come out and say NOOOOO.... You want Kinect to fail, and Microsoft to leave the videogame industry because Kinect bombed?
