that entire.....ENTIRE..... from start to finish article was NOTHING but speculation which is what being an analysis is about, educated specuation, but specualtion non the less, and when speculation presented as fact with then becomes bullshit, and gizmodo is and expert??? fucking news to me
Gizmodo is a person? I believe you mean me. Expert is a stretch, but I know what I am talking about for certain. For the purposes of this internet debate I could be considered one, and could easily explain what that number represents in a different topic. I certainly am expert material on certain apsects of this incident, and can speak to the whole process including how it is going to play out. Also, speculation is not the right word. The accuracy is there for what they speak to. Their analysis is 100% correct in context.
my bad about the name wasn't paying attention at all which I usually do (see my post where i mention Kasz216 if I hadn't looked I would have surely put Kaz lol)
anyway that wasn't an attempt at an insult lol, it was the first time I've ever quoted you and well I haven't been paying much attention to your post in the past (also not an insult) so my knowledge of you if VERY limited hence the fucking news to me thanks for giving me that head's up about yourself