Wonktonodi said:
TruckOSaurus said:
I'm kinda bummed that we have to turn to lurker lynching but I don't have any other leads right now.
There's something I do wanna talk about though:
Is there still people who believe we're dealing with a Vigilante instead of a Serial Killer? Because to me the vigilante option makes no sense whatsoever.
- First because that Vigilante would have to be pretty stupid.
- Second because although he was lurking, I don't see any pro-town reasoning that would lead to choosing to off him.
- Third because Arsonist as always been an anti-town role.
Now if someone has some info (maybe from the theme of the game) that would make it possible for a Vigilante to be our arsonist, please share it with me. If not I think we should accept that whoever killed Vetteman is anti-town.
|
Be sure to press baal hard tomorrow.
|
If there's anyone I want to vote for besides trash, it's Baal. I don't trust everything he's saying, and more importantly, I don't like that Heph is defending him. There's just no reason for it outside of being a cop and scanning him innocent and yaknow, even so, there's nothing saying that Baal isn't a godfather, or that Heph is an insane cop or something.
And I know for a fact that there aren't any masons.
There is literally no reason why Baal should be trusted. The only thing that keeps stopping me is that I keep thinking that he's a noob and deserves a break, and just might be a lot smarter than I'm currently giving him credit for. No offense, Baal. You just haven't proven yourself yet, to me at least.
