CGI-Quality said:
AppleHater said:
ethomaz said:
osamanobama said:
ethomaz said:
After...
Gran Turismo - 8.5
Killzone 3 - 8.5
LittleBigPlanet - 9.0
Anyone expect better score from IGN?
|
but they did give halo reach 9.5 (ign Uk gave it a 10) thats like the last game theyve ranked high
|
That's before GT5 ;)... now IGN not give more high scores.
|
It started with Reach. All gaming sites started to review games harshly starting with Reach not GT5. Fable 3 and Fallout new vegas all got low review scores and they came out before GT5.
I dont know why you ps3 fanboys think IGN has some sort of vendetta agianst ps3 and its games ? Maybe you should stop and realize that maybe the games got the score they so rightfully deserve? Because honestly Killzone 3 and GT5 were failures ( please dont result in a ban for saying the truth).
They got the reviews they deserve and their meta scores are basically the exact same thing as IGN scores so IGN is not agianst you guys.
Anyways Homefront has a lot a of issues, the game is short, the AI is really dumb, and the gameplay is nothing new. It got a 7 and i think IGN gave it the right score, i dont want them to overrate games, which could cause me to waste 60 bucks.
|
Neither KZ3 nor GT5 were failures and try posting without insulting people.
|
Please bold the insults, cause i dont remeber insulting anyone. Is it because i called him a ps3 fanboy? Its not a insult since he is one. And yes killzone 3 and GT5 were failures in my eyes, Killzone 3 was suppose to get higher review scores than Reach with an amazing story, and great online. Only one thing actually turned out to be true, we all know which. GT5 was suppose to the game that put ps3 on top and be the highest rated race this gen. It did not do anything for ps3 and its reviews were bad anyway you look at it.
Please dont attack me I dont want to derail the thread or get banned.
