VGC Mafia Round 24

[theprof00]

Linkzmax said:

nen-suer said:http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3832041

@prof:
1) As I said above to scottie, I think there's a goood chance mafia are on scottie already. Whether they voted before or after the tipping vote I don't know, but I do think it was odd that j0 returned after a long absence and immediately voted scottie is quite suspicious. Especially given that he's admitted to not being completely caught up AND urges a slowing down of votes for discussion's sake.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3834625:
2) First, scum or not I think scottie has had a horrible game. Don't take that the wrong way though scottie, I do hope that mistakes are learned from and more rounds will be played!
Second, wtf is "But with that post you made saying nen is innocent. We know he's innocent, but you used your later flip to make us look really hard into lynching nen." You picked on me for the use of "we" and now you use it along with "know he's innocent?" I guess I'm not in your "we" because until recently I did THINK nen was innocent, but now I lean the other way. A scottie flip could influence that, but I'll cross that bridge if the time comes to do so.

Back to our back-and-forth:
2) There was no connection between my pointing out the links and saying I'm wary of you. The connection is that we shared suspicions.
5) Truck will have to answer that one. Perhaps he doesn't share your sentiments (or the likes of Heph and other scum from last round) that I'm a good player. Not pertinent information, but it wouldn't bother me one bit if that's the case.
B) Or if you flip scum.
Bonus) I did answer it when I said "I'd look to expose them" but since I didn't know the full question, I'll answer again. It depends on the circumstances. If I feel I could learn some information I would play along, but I'd probably still make my suspicions known in a way in case of my death should the game continue for longer than a day. Otherwise I'd get straight to the exposing.

Are you online and able to post now? Need a speedy response to a question.

1) I think so too. Mafia are more than capable of throwing each other under the bus, that is a fact. I was really really hoping trucks would've voted though. Those other players, it's just such a small piece of evidence...but I was most strongly interested in trucks. To me, it ended up pretty much as a wash, but I've been looking at j0 as well, and his posts fresh off the absence are suspicious. The only problem now is, are they voting because he's mafia and want to look pro-town, or are they voting because he diverts a kill away from SaK, or are they just voting because they feel it's the right vote. Based on j0's comment, he really only reiterated what evidence was already there..that gives me a scum read, or at least not aware of his environment.

2) Well that post was meant to bully scottie into confessing. I applied pressure that would make him think that the town was an overbearing presence and saw through his scheme. For that reason, I said "we". I was hoping he would cave, but he never answered the post. Hopefully, he will skip right over this one and answer it before he reads this like he did with other replies.

 

Back and forth

2) guess I inferred more than what was written.
5) Simple curiosity. I think you are missing the point though, it's not just about you. It's why pick them and why so many. It wasn't an accusation, I wanted to get him to talk.
B) It only matters to ME, but you are correct, either flip is worth a more detailed look.

Bonus) That's normal. I was doing that with Gnizmo. At the point when I had written that, I had first accused, but then defended scottie, and not pursued any interest into those other players. So, I was saying "you are defending them", but keeping an open mind that he could be framing them. I was "playing along" with his post in the case that he was scum.