| nordlead said: oh, I agree. There can be some useful information. How useful is to be determined. If people find it interesting the only thing I can do as a non-mod (game wise anyways As for Gniz. Honestly I would expect very low contribution during day 1 from everyone. I see in my potals that I had 3 NC day 1 and 6 C day 2 (ok, maybe I didn't just look and my memory might suck Also, as asked above, can you please explain your j0 suspicion. You say you suspect him (and 3 others) based on creating your potals but you never stated why. I know why (or at least a reason) for SAK and Stefl. |
) is to vote for you or anyone else, however I doubt I'd get any support from the town. My other problem is people having "mistakes" and "slipups" which are a judgement call which if a scum is creating the table can influence easily making a player look bad without posting links.despite this feeling like some kind of set-up to me;
j0 has barely contributed. That in itself isn't much, but he could be described as an active lurker. On day 1, he posted this: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3816523
It just screams contribution without content, on top of what I would say is an innaccurate assessment of the mafia # discussion. It is very important, (and easy) to find out how many players there are so that we can weigh the risks of lynch vs no lynch etc etc.
This post he made later is a bit far-reaching
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3819246
Two games ago (MINHA) he also said that mafia don't lurk and that lynch all lurkers is a bad strategy. That game had all the mafia lurking...indeed, it cannot be argued that LaL doesn't work. The post above makes me think that j0 is trying to contribute as little as possible and casually dismiss the overall discussion as paranoia.
I find this strange as well. It semi-correlates with my suspects.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3819828
In the link above, he says No Lynch, yadda yadda yadda, but doesn't vote it.
Over the course of the enxt 8 hours, hat, gniz, stelf, and himself vote no lynch. 2 out of those 3 not including j0 are suspects. Could be a directive, who knows.
There's not much more, but honestly, looking through every single post and really digging through them, nobody jumped out the way those 4,5 did.
ill be back later.
