By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
hatmoza said:


1. Here's my bone with your post, It's mostly observations and emotions.

2. And what gets me is that they're observations already made countless times by other players! Except you made them wordier. Heck, you gave two word observations their own paragraphs ... You said heph was killed because he was a good player. Didn't someone earlier today say the same, except in a more brief form?

3. You make that statement just to end it by saying, "oh we shouldn't think so much of the fos because heph was town." Is someone not under the radar trying to indirectly cover for their fellow scum?

4. Prof and Gniz are fighting, what's new? They make you cringe? Thanks for sharing that. what's so odd about them exchanging votes? Seriously? Gnizmo gave a whole page of why he voted Zexen. Prof admitted he's voting for me because of a gut feeling. WHAT IS SO RANDOM ABOUT THAT! You are trying to make yourself look like you're contributing to the game when all you did was make a huge post of nothing.

5. Then you squeeze that  flag raising stunt about ME  prolonging an argument I didn't even respond to until 200 posts later in the game when I wasn't even arguing about it, just using it as as a means  to support my SK theory. And the way you snuck that fos in the middle of repeated observation was really sneaky Wonk.

6. "I'm glad [Trucks] took the initiative in finding Hephs interactions ..." Sound familiar Wonk? That's because you basically just told Trucks the same thing I did a couple dozen posts ago! Seriously dude, are you just skimming through the game summarizing everyone's thoughts into your own words and shoving them into a post of your own? Are you even trying to be productive on your own in this game? Only scum behave the way you are...

7. You'll post more tomorrow, how cute because I was just about to head to bed before I saw this clusterfuck post that popped my snoozing bubble. Save your posts, I've seen enough plagiarism for one night.

8. Listen, Wonk, you're new, I know. But because you're new don't take it personal when I vote and possibly lead a lynch against you today. Yourpost was so big and so unproductive that it's screaming scum.

9. -Scum don't try to scumhunt because they're scum. And when they try to, it's so fake, just like your post.



1. What is this game other than observations?

2. Some of the observations were made by other people.  Others were not.  Some I agreed with others although I praised the effort I was disagreeing with the direction of the effort.

3. I said that and stick by it because I think that looking for connections between who a player suspected and who could be scum to lynch him, isn't the best way to look for scum.  It is too open to manupulation by the scum.  And can easily be used to point blame at other people. 

4.  What was new was that the fighting STOPPED! and not only that but they both voted for people other than each other.  It seemed rather strange to me still does, but it resumed again today but it still feels odd to me.  The fact you think it's nothing when one of them had voted for you is even more troubleing.

5. 200 posts? um dude I have it set to 100 posts and both of your posts on it on in the first half of the first page. You were the FIRST to respont to it So hardly 200 posts one being just two posts latter.  Why are you lying to defend yourself?

6. This goes along with point 3.  I praised Truck for doing the work of going back and doing this while disagreeing with there worth.  I feel it is better to be posative to those who participate to get people to keep bringing up points instead of being instulting.  Even if I disagree I will do it with points not insults.  Because I apreciate when people do the work to find the patterns and hope they will do the work again.

7. My last post was over and hour before you posted, so I'm not sure what you were getting at other than being rude and degrading.

8. I don't take it personal I think you are scum trying to get rid of a person who was slightly onto you but now is all over you.  I like how you need to focus on me being knew to try and reduce my credibility.

9. Another insult to my post once again trying to reduce credibility by saying a fun phrase but not actually adding any point.

I cut all the paragraphs of what parotting is out of your post because that is clear. However my post wasn't just a parroting post.  It had several new observations that you commented on in the quoted post.  Also it had what I hoped the town would do before I returned or what I would do if it didn't happen.  Sadly I've now been so focused on you that I wasn't able to do it but it can resume once you are gone.