| noname2200 said: Also, please do not post at night. (Obviously, everyone's been pretty good about that so far) I know it's become traditional to do so, but we intend to enforce the rule fairly strictly: the first violator will only get a warning, but the second will be unable to vote the following day, and more severe consequences will follow, culminating in a modkill. I don't want that, you don't want that, nobody wants that, so let's please not make it necessary. Thank you! |
I'm not sure why enforce it when almost every other game people did it.
Anywho, Heres my analysis.
1. I liked dtewi's view on silver tiger, I didn't know how I missed that, and I would like silver tiger to say something about that, or ugly things might happen.
2. Gnizmo hasn't replied to prof's post but he did say hes not feeling well, so that cancels something out. I feel prof argues just for the sake of argueing, and I know he said that he would probe on people that aren't sayin' much. The whole thing was wierd, I think one of them is scum, the way they voted each other though, so since I'm not sure which one it is, I would go out and say.
fos: prof and gniz
3. You people nitpick my choice of words for little reason, if this keeps happening, I might as well just vote for you because no one gains anything because my analogies are dumb.
4. I should of said this in day 1, but this is about the basic game mechanic arguement hat/nen and zex were argueing. If I recall correctly, Zex voted for someone because he disagree with the rule. I found the vote ridicuolous, and even though I fos nen, voting is a different story, and I don't take it too well. I'm also aware he took the vote back, but thats because of an unforseen mod kill for gow.
fos:zex
5. I'm aware that not all of this is accurate, so if any of you guys see anything weird or silly or wrong that I posted, then please correct me and this is no way to spread misinformation, its just my analysis so far. I'm leaning for a vote on Silver Tiger, though.
