By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Doobie_wop said:

Killzone on the other hand didnt win any awards or was considered the best of anything. So comparing it to halo is just idoitic.




I don't really care about the little thing you and Prophecy have going on, but I thought I'd be annoying and just list a few awards and stuff Killzone 2 received:

Technical Innovation in AI and best AI in a AAA Game

http://aigamedev.com/open/editorial/2009-awards-results/

The Roses Design Awards - The Best Use of Animation

http://www.joystiq.com/2009/11/02/killzone-2-cg-intro-wins-roses-design-awards/

The 55th Annual Ivor Novello Award for Best Original Video Game Score

http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/05/21/killzone-2-wins-ivor-novello-award

It also won some other stuff, but I can't be bothered looking. As for Killzone 2 not being the best at anything, what exactly is Halo 3 the best at? You must be including the PC into this, because from the top of my head I can already claim that Killzone 2 is the most technically impressive FPS on consoles.

Careful, someone will bring up the scale of Halo games and the numbers of players it has going on in a single map as proof that the engine it's using is more capable than Killzone 2's or anything else on consoles.  ¬_¬

Conveniently forgetting anything about MAG and its 256 players games.