well they wont lose me. i like advancement in gaming in all aspects because it improve my gaming experience. whether it is user interface, graphics, physics, story and all the other directions for advancement. the problem i had with the wii was that it only advancement was the interface everything else was still last gen imo. i still enjoyed playing it and never said anything bad about it except maybe about precision and some other things (never used motion+). it had a great advantage the others didnt have.
oh and people saying about the price, and that it is a copy. there has been know price stated yet and i doubt it will go up to $500, $400 would probably be the most imo. quite alot of the features have been copied from the wii and there no denying the similarity's that the games have, but there are video's of this tech being demonstrated on you tube going back as far as 2004, and the ps moveye (combined move and eye because i feel sony is missing the point) has the eye as well which was its original purpose, sony identified problems with the camera, like the need for buttons, it was also suppose to do alot more (eyedentify comes to mind). it was suppose to do everything natal promises. which is another point, albeit slightly of topic, sony showed respect to wii, were as peter molyneux and microsoft claims natal is new and revolutionary.
correct me if I am wrong
stop me if I am bias
I love a good civilised debate (but only if we can learn something).
