LordTheNightKnight said: Okay, looking at it again, I see he didn't, but it still had a hell of a lot of assumptions that just dont hold up. As for his reply clarifying his comment, I do agree on that somewhat. |
Whether you agree with his conclusions or not , he has presented a well thought out argument. That's the main reason why I consider his post , the post of the thread.
Without some pretty specfic information from the conduit devs or sega , we have no way of knowing how well or poorly the conduit did for a fact. Because of this , the most well reasoned argument gets the cookie.