darendt said:
I agree, you do fail.
I suggest you actually read this thread, or at least the post by MAFKKA that explains my post very well. The option to your question however is BD. 1 Disc would fit the entire game....including the stuff the Arcade users dont need. As for my reference to the 2 discs and racing games, had you been on this or any other forum and payed any attention, you would remember the back and forth about how we will never see a 2 disc game on the 360, 9GB is plenty of space.....oops, 6GB, Racing games will never fill a disc let alone be on 2 etc. etc. The same people were praising the 360 for not having any "mandatory" installs for games because dvd is so much better than the unnecessary BD drive in the PS3. Now that 2 disc games are showing up more and more and in a racing game no less, it seems the 360 faithful all of the sudden love having 2 discs and wasting space on the HDD to install the second disc. Or there memory card that they must now buy as well if they don't want a HDD. |
MAFKKA's post was as full of fail as yours was my friend. Explain to me why some PS3 games also need installs in order to run a game THAT IS ON BR???
I was not around for the whole 2 disc debate, and if I were I would not have entered into it because it is a pointless argument. However, you have some MORE fail in your last paragraph, the second disc is NOT a manditory install, the BR drive is a luxury that IS unecesary, and IS partially to blame for why the PS3 was priced so high at launch, and as a symptom of the price, has not been selling as well as it's compeditors until the latest price drop. Most two disc games do NOT require an install, just a slightly annoying disc swap. Thirdly, the second disc "wastes" less than 2 gigs, and if you really want to play that content, it is not a waste at all. That's like saying GT5 is a waste of BR disc space...it's just plain stupid. Lastly, you can also install a portion unto your system memory if you MUST play the content. Like I said, it's completely optional.
