By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - PlayStation Studios and Nintendo Entertainment Planning and Development - Which is the better first party group?

Hynad said:
Doctor_MG said:

Nintendo could live without third party products where MS and Sony can't. This is evident in game sales. Nintendo could not live without third party developers because Nintendo utilizes them to increase their output, but those products are still first party because of the points above. 

You’re starting to get my point.

Dude I think everyone gets what you're saying you're the one not getting what everyone is telling you.



Around the Network
pikashoe said:
Hynad said:

You’re starting to get my point.

Dude I think everyone gets what you're saying you're the one not getting what everyone is telling you.

I understand it clearly. You are the ones not comfortable when someone doesn’t picture Nintendo as God.



pikashoe said:
Hynad said:

You’re starting to get my point.

Dude I think everyone gets what you're saying you're the one not getting what everyone is telling you.

It’s literally the Principal Skinner meme and I love watching it unfold in real time. Especially as he keeps telling people they don’t “get it”, as if he is dropping deep logic here that is just beyond most of the users. 



LudicrousSpeed said:
pikashoe said:

Dude I think everyone gets what you're saying you're the one not getting what everyone is telling you.

It’s literally the Principal Skinner meme and I love watching it unfold in real time. Especially as he keeps telling people they don’t “get it”, as if he is dropping deep logic here that is just beyond most of the users. 

Please, kindly get lost. 

I haven’t disputed the ownership of titles. Only the nature of their production. 

You are playing semantics, instead of seeing this at face value. 

That comment of yours is nicely displaying I was never ever wrong about you and your nature. Not that there was any doubt. 



Hynad said:
pikashoe said:

Dude I think everyone gets what you're saying you're the one not getting what everyone is telling you.

I understand it clearly. You are the ones not comfortable when someone doesn’t picture Nintendo as God.

Ok, you clearly don't get what everyone is telling you. Let's be real no one complains more about nintendo than nintendo fans.

Also congrats for single handedly derailing the thread.



Around the Network
pikashoe said:
Hynad said:

I understand it clearly. You are the ones not comfortable when someone doesn’t picture Nintendo as God.

Ok, you clearly don't get what everyone is telling you. Let's be real no one complains more about nintendo than nintendo fans.

Also congrats for single handedly derailing the thread.

You’re one to talk. Congrats on providing absolutely nothing into the mix. 



Hynad said:
pikashoe said:

Ok, you clearly don't get what everyone is telling you. Let's be real no one complains more about nintendo than nintendo fans.

Also congrats for single handedly derailing the thread.

You’re one to talk. Congrats on providing absolutely nothing into the mix. 

Feels like talking to a brick wall here



pikashoe said:
Hynad said:

You’re one to talk. Congrats on providing absolutely nothing into the mix. 

Feels like talking to a brick wall here

My thought exactly with some of you in this thread.

This started with this one question:

-Who can survive just by 1st party alone?

Now, tell me, how is a first party IP title being developed or co-developed by a third party developer equivalent to surviving by first party alone
The reliance on outside devs remains there, which is why I said none of the big 3 could survive alone in the long run.

Last edited by Hynad - on 24 February 2022

The question of who can survive on first party alone is a simple question with an obvious answer, because Nintendo has literally been doing it for generations. But you don’t like the answer so you are trying to harp on irrelevant semantics.

It’s not any of our fault that Microsoft or Sony don’t have stables of long standing high quality IPs that they can outsource to other studios to make first party games with. Nintendo on the other hand does. They also have a much stronger first party offering. This is obvious when you look at sales (nothing MS offers is close and now with GamePass nothing will ever be close, and the only Sony titles that approach Nintendo sales do so with massive bundling and deep price cuts).

But you know all of this which is why you want to exclude it, because excluding it means nothing to MicroSony but has a big effect on Nintendo. All of these companies consider these games first party, get with the times. It doesn’t matter what you think qualifies as first or third party, it’s widely accepted what is first party by pretty much everyone else.

Sony doesn’t have a Fire Emblem or Pokémon in their arsenal to outsource but if they did, you’d consider it first party.

What a stupid hill to die on.



Hynad said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

It’s literally the Principal Skinner meme and I love watching it unfold in real time. Especially as he keeps telling people they don’t “get it”, as if he is dropping deep logic here that is just beyond most of the users. 

Please, kindly get lost. 

I haven’t disputed the ownership of titles. Only the nature of their production. 

You are playing semantics, instead of seeing this at face value. 

That comment of yours is nicely displaying I was never ever wrong about you and your nature. Not that there was any doubt. 

You are Sony fan, no wonder.