I'm so angry gamer no gave horizon a 60 , This game is better than a 60 troll score.
I read the review and noted one bit of particular interest, which is this;
"Utrolig nok har Guerrilla tatt svakhetene fra Horizon Zero Dawn og fremhevet hver og en av disse." - "Incredibly enough, Guerrilla took the weaknesses of Horizon Zero Dawn and accentuated each and every one of these."
I've read/watched many reviews now, and the consensus seems to be the exact opposite; Forbidden West has taken the strengths of the first game and improved upon them all. I'm not one to discredit reviews, but I find it odd that this one had a polar opposite conclusion to that of practially everyone else.
Some of his criticism might well be due, he picks out progression being less meaningful since you're inundated with new weapons and XP points at all turns and refers to many of the added features and depth as superfluous.
Don't know what to make of it, it's not terribly written, and I can't really argue for or against his points since I've yet to play it myself. But, I can safely say that his conclusions clash with almost every single review I've read or seen so far.