By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - PlayStation Nation | an HBO original

I don't like participating much in the 'who will Sony acquire' bandwagon, but I think the best option is Konami. Not because Konami is good - heavens no, they're one of the worst publishers/devs out there - but because they have amazing IP that would be right at home with Sony.

Square-Enix, too, but sony doesn't have the money for Square-Enix, I don't think. Thats easily....lemme check. Okay, 5.9 billion. uh, they should get on that!

Konami - 3.24 billion
Square-enix - 5.9 billion
Capcom - 4.9 Billion
Bandai-Namco - 4.6 Billion
Sega - 3.6 Billion
Take-Two - 4.94 Billion (Seems low if you ask me)

So yeah, some options, all within the realm of possibility.

Ubisoft - 7 Billion
EA - 11.1 Billion

so closer to viable than one might think. Then again, I looked and checked multiple sources after getting this info and it seems these numbers are incomplete or in flux, so I do apologize if you google it and find different answers.



My Console Library:

PS5, Switch, XSX

PS4, PS3, PS2, PS1, WiiU, Wii, GCN, N64 SNES, XBO, 360

3DS, DS, GBA, Vita, PSP, Android

Around the Network

Noticed what could be an ankylosaur at 0:57, tattoos or body paint on Aloy at 0:38 and 0:41 that may either be part of an outfit or cosmetic customization, and 1:29 makes me wonder if there will be races, too.

Just two more weeks!



DonFerrari said:
EricHiggin said:

I agree, though if SNY were to go all in on a TT type deal, then they likely would end up in a similar position as MS where they won't be making any more purchases for the next year or two. Maybe the odd tiny one here and there but that would probably be the extent of it.

It's hard to say if SNY would want to put themselves in that position. They would have the quality and name recognition taken care of, but would that be better than buying a whole bunch of studios and IP for billions each and worry more about offering quantity instead?

Probably depends on how likely it is that TT may get bought up by someone else. If SNY wanted to keep Bungie within reach, I'd guess they'd do the same if TT was likely to be whisked away.

I`m not much into Sony getting Take Two, most of their games although selling well and reviewing fine aren`t the games I`m most into, besides the part of removing multiplatform content from other places they were before. But from a business perspective it would likely be a good acquisition.

I don't like the acquisitions at all either but this seems to be a situation of, it simply is what it is.

I mean, if XB was buying up smaller studios and building from there like SNY typically does, then that would've been more palatable. Throwing around tens of billions, and approaching hundreds of billions, is a buying the industry out kind of thing.

I really don't like that, along with the fact that it pretty much forces everyone else to follow suit. It would still be more acceptable if everything were to remain cross platform, in which case that's not looking to be the outcome for the most part.

SNY nor MS are likely too worried about the hardcore when it comes to these acquisitions. The hardcore will stay put for the most part. It's the casual audience that can be more easily swayed. For this reason both need to focus more on studios and franchises that cater to that demographic.

TT would be huge for either brand and would guarantee a ton of hardware and MTX sales. It would certainly be a good business deal in general. Though it looks as if new info has come out leading to suggest SNY perhaps is spending another $4B on someone else. That's definitely not TT, and would make it seem that SNY is buying much smaller than MS and looking to build up. Which may be for the best all around, especially for the industry as a whole.



PotentHerbs said:

Apparently, Sony has already spent 7.4B of its allocated budget, which includes deals that haven't been made public yet.

So they have another 3.8B deal that is yet to be revealed. Who would fall in this price range? The only one that comes to mind is Sega. Maybe Capcom or Konami if Bungie is listed as a 2.4B acquisition and Sony accounts the 1.2B for their employees under something else?

Bungie may be there to cater more to the older crowd, while Sega would be there to cater more to the younger crowd?

If this is a gaas move, Sega would make sense.

There was that somewhat recent Sega/MS Azure Cloud games deal though.

Would that get in the way of a SNY buyout, or could this be part of the SNY deal with Sega?

SNY does have a deal with MS to use Azure correct?



twintail said:
PotentHerbs said:

Apparently, Sony has already spent 7.4B of its allocated budget, which includes deals that haven't been made public yet.

So they have another 3.8B deal that is yet to be revealed. Who would fall in this price range? The only one that comes to mind is Sega. Maybe Capcom or Konami if Bungie is listed as a 2.4B acquisition and Sony accounts the 1.2B for their employees under something else?

Hopefully not Konami.

I don't think Sony needs an IP suite without teams to actually make the games.

Konami have the teams, what they need is likely improvement in governance and top level leadership. Perhaps with Sony owning they could even get some of the talents back.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
SegaHeart said:

Sifu developers should make a Jackie Chan videogame and I think Sony should buy them ?

Jet Li game was great on PS2.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Bandorr said:
BasilZero said:

The $60 is for the PS5 ver and the $70 is for the PS4 and PS5 ver right?

$60 is for PS4 that "free upgrades" to PS5.

PS5 is $70.

Thus it is better to get the $60 and "free upgrade" to the $70.

If you're talking about Sifu, these numbers are outright wrong. IT's 40 bucks on PS4 and PS5, an indie, not a AAA. Even in Canada, the Deluxe Edition with the art book and all that jazz is only 67 dollars (50 USD) 

**edit** Seems you're talking about Horizon Forbidden West. Ignore me. 



My Console Library:

PS5, Switch, XSX

PS4, PS3, PS2, PS1, WiiU, Wii, GCN, N64 SNES, XBO, 360

3DS, DS, GBA, Vita, PSP, Android

SegaHeart said:
DonFerrari said:

Jet Li game was great on PS2.

My favorite from Jet li PS2 was this 7:16 mark. Face on boiling water. at 7:16 mark.

The gameplay was very unique.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Runa216 said:
Bandorr said:

$60 is for PS4 that "free upgrades" to PS5.

PS5 is $70.

Thus it is better to get the $60 and "free upgrade" to the $70.

If you're talking about Sifu, these numbers are outright wrong. IT's 40 bucks on PS4 and PS5, an indie, not a AAA. Even in Canada, the Deluxe Edition with the art book and all that jazz is only 67 dollars (50 USD) 

**edit** Seems you're talking about Horizon Forbidden West. Ignore me. 

Horizon Zero Dawn



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

BasilZero said:

Load times for Jump Force is unbearable lol

Some games are very strange how long it takes to load even when looking very simple and light games.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."