Uh..yeah...way to insert the Civil War as an example on a topic that has nothing to do with gun control - both in context or relevance...

It requires either a brainwashed populace or a large military to subjugate people. 
Militaries are expensive, and it's easy to push back.  

Someone inserted Civil War as an example of how guns are used for freedom in the second page, well before he did.

Buckets of it lol.

Ofcourse it has everything to do with gun control since the confederacy viewed the legitimate government as a tyrannous government that they had to resist. Their reason for this opposition was horrible but that doesn´t change the fact that the 2nd amendment was already deeply rooted in society. The confederate army was also mostly a voluntary one where citizens contributed with different supplies, including weaponry.

wow, so you're a completely moral person? you've done an act that you you could cause harm and went through with it anyway?

well goodness the christians have been waiting for your return for years now and yet here you are... its a pleasure to meet you

"What evil acts do most people do?  "

lol do i really need to go into this? i mean really?

Why would I do something that causes someone harm?

What kind of weird world do you live in?

Yes really, because I want to know what evil acts everyone does.  I want to know what your moral bar is.  

"What kind of weird world do you live in?"

uh reality i guess? where everyone is to some extent malevolent?

"Why would I do something that causes someone harm?"

this argument is starting to take a really infantile turn... ok why do people hurt other people?

i mean you do acknowledge that people harm other people right?

and you are from the same species correct? which means that whatever causes people to harm other people is also present in you

unless you think you are somehow a unique case out of the entire species

"yes really, because I want to know what evil acts everyone does.  I want to know what your moral bar is.  "

ok i'd say that lying is an example that's pretty frequent

>uh reality i guess? where everyone is to some extent malevolent?

That's what I'm wondering, what do you consider malevolent?

For example you might consider someone lusting after someone else to be malevolent.  Even if they aren't really actively harming anyone else.  Most people do that.  It isn't illegal, or usually harmful to others, but it's generally considered a sin and would therefore be malevolent.  

But if you personally didn't think that lusting after someone is a sin or something, then you'd likely not believe it to be malevolent.  

If you consider those kinds of things, yes most people are malevolent.  

>i mean you do acknowledge that people harm other people right?

OF COURSE PEOPLE DO.

>why do people hurt other people?

People hurt other people for all kinds of reasons.  Some people have no such thing called empathy.  Some people have other mental disorders.  

Some people steal because they are hungry.  Sometimes people lie to spare someone's feelings, because they have empathy.

When I was talking about people usually being "decent".  I didn't mean they were absolutely flawless, and never lied or never lusted, etc.  
I believe that most people want the best for everyone.  Although the more I talk to some people like yourself, the more I become convinced I am  a unique case amongst the species, because apparently it's unheard of to want the best for people.  

If I could feed the world at the cost of myself, I'd do that.  

If I could end all conflict at the cost of myself, I'd do that.  

I never said that I was perfect, I never said that most people are perfect.  I said I believe most people want the best for everyone.  

I believe most people want a society where there's no murder, no stealing, etc, a society where everyone is able to afford food, housing and healthcare.  A society where freedoms of everyone are protected.