hadoram said:
onionberry said:
Google, Nintendo and Pokemon company invested 20 million to make this app. Pokemon is not for the most part owner by Nintendo because Creatures, Game Freak and Nintendo own 33% each one. The publisher is not Nintendo, the publisher is the Pokemon company, the game is using Niantic's servers and Nintendo is developing the Pokemon go plus accessory, which is going to be distribuited by the pokemon company. as you can see, there are a lot of parts involve.
|
google invested in the tech much earlier though (niantic was part of google some time ago and they made the game ingress).
Where did you found hte information the pokemon company is the publisher? they never publushed a game before, i doubt that.
I also doubt niantic has servers. They are a (small) developmend team. They dont have servers. The game is probl using any third party servers (like amazon etc).
|
The offical pokemon apps (Pokedex, Shuffle, and a few of the smaller games) to this point have been published by the Pokemon Company and not Nintendo. And if you ask Google "who published Pokemon Go" the answer is the Pokemon company. So the pokemon company has published games before. Most of the game's problems though are Niantic as the developer and the one who has the servers.
The problems with the game is essencially two different things.
1) How the application handles the incoming and out going data. The more people in the area and the higher density of gyms/pokestops seem to cause the application to stutter and sometime shut down. Especially if you have an older device, my sister has an older pad and when there are a few pokestops that crop up at the same time it usually causes the game to crash.
2)Log in server(s) are overworked and cannot handle the high log in peroids. I'm guessing but they probally have a simular set up as Blizzard does for Wow. And with each expansion you can expect one thing, the log in server will have long waits and sometime not even let you in. And they just don't "scale" for the maximum because usually interest dies down and getting additional servers that will not be used again is wasteful. And while they can "rent" servers there is a security issue, especially for log in servers since its the gateway to the user's information.