Just because some people buy shoes for 1000 bucks you do the same?  Some people understand the term VALUE others dont. Not everyone is the same.

 I ignore every action game (slow paced games are an exception) when the framerate drops below 30 fps more than once every 2 seconds.

And reviewers are stupid anyway and are not doing their job if framerate disaster games like The Last of Us (drops to 18 fos) or Bayonetta1 (the whole port ran with half the FPS of the 360 version and has just 2 points less on metacritic!) or Skyrim on PS3 can get such high scores.
Or games like Castlevania Lords of shadows on 360 can get more than 80% even tho it drops to 12 fps.

Gameplay should never be compromised at all.

Well, i bought all those games, can i complain?

I like Ubisoft, loved Child of Light, but they are pissing me off. I really wanted Freedom Cry DLC, but not going to buy the game again for that.
I also want to play Valiant Hearts, but the fact that they don't port something so easy annoys me. I won't buy it until it is released on Wii U or for $2 on steam.

They can only blame themselfs for what happened with Rayman, putting it among GTA V, Pokemon and other big hitters. Now they are going to put this game again just to die. While i have no plans of buying it now, because it honestly looks mediocre, I would have bought in May for Wii U out of hype.

Next year i will get a PS4 for Bloodborne, but won't buy their games there, because they really let me down this year.

and then they will complain that their games dont sell on wii u

Sure you can complain, but the truth is that we are way less than necessary to make it a viable market for the company.

The lack of port for Brave Valiant Hearts has a reason, as the decision was taken not only based on the effort required to port the game, the game is pretty dark and after the poor sales of mature games on the console Ubisoft did not wanted to risk it, by the way sales of Child of Light on the Wii U were not very high also.

The Rayman Legends release date was a mistake, but it came out with some decent improvements on the Wii U against other consoles, and even then is not very well ranked on the console, beaten by games like Mario & Sonic at the..., and Wii Party U, a real shame.

Well if you don't buy the shoes then you can't complain when the shoemaker stop creating new ones your size, because there is a market for their shoes and you are clearly not part of it.

So, in your opinion, we should keep supporting a company that, not only delays games on purpose, also delivers incomplete experiences, just for the sake of a vague promise of "keep making games"? Oh, also the same company told everyone over the media that we, Nintendo console owners, only like kiddy games over their "mature games"?

I'm sorry, but I value my money more than that. I was one of the people that were overhyped about Watch_Dogs, and ended up totally frustrated with the delay. I used to support Ubisoft, getting games I wasn't satisfied with, just because they promised that they would deliver big things for us, and that they wouldn't let us down. But now I'm disappointed at them. And, as what happened to EA, I'll stop with said support. They won't see a penny from me anymore.

God forbid Ubisoft heard you. It would mean the end of Just Dance and The Voice for Wii U as we know it!!!

I hope them deleting the Tweat is something more positive like they will release the game with the Added Content, plus at a $40. I think if they do this it could have the potential of 500k with it coming out near Xmas and all.

That's just me hoping for the best. But we all know this news means the worst...

The truth is that you don't know the actual sales of Child of Light, so it may very well be satisfactory. Valiant Hearts, Child of light, or any mature game can find a decent audience on the Wii U (especially the eshop, according to their demographics http://wiiudaily.com/2014/08/interesting-wii-u-eshop-details-revealed-at-unite-2014/ ) IF they are made well with the hardware in mind and with sufficient advertisement.

... are you actually suggesting that keeping the customer in the dark about their plan to not support the game after release in the way that they supported the other versions is what they SHOULD have done? Rather than actually supporting it, and showing the customers that they give a damn?

You clearly haven't been following what people have said in all of this.

1. I, for instance, had full intention of buying Watch_Dogs for Wii U, when it was set to release alongside the other consoles.

2. When the delay was announced, it went from "definite buy" to "going to have to convince me, now", because if it's getting a 6 month delay, it had better be worth it.

3. One of the conditions of actually supporting the game was that DLC had to still be coming. I'm not supporting a third party that isn't going to support me and the games I buy from them. If this tweet is accurate, then that's a huge strike against the game (there are ways to compensate... no DLC because it's included in the base game, or much lower price, or extra exclusive content, or game significantly improved over the others with regards to its weaknesses).

Note that I didn't buy Call of Duty: Ghost... until the Freefall DLC was released for the system (for free, as was appropriate, considering). Then I bought the game, expecting that the next CoD would also be coming to the system. If the developers shows me respect, I'll be far more likely to support their product.

4. There was no plan to boycott. I bought Rayman Legends, and I bought Assassin's Creed III. This was to be my third Ubisoft title for the Wii U.

5. Developers are stupid for throwing money away - that is, wasting money on half-arsed ports rather than either not supporting in the first place (and providing real justification for that failure to support) or putting real effort into the game. At this point, it's looking like Watch_Dogs Wii U has been designed to fail - they're intentionally wasting money, from what I can see, to justify stopping support for the Wii U.

Consider EA. They had a supposed "partnership" with Nintendo, that was supposed to produce a heap of games. What did it produce? Four titles, all of which were sabotaged immediately. Mass Effect 3 was announced as a "special edition"... only to have Mass Effect Trilogy announced for the other systems, at the same price. Fifa 13 for Wii U was just a port of Fifa 12 for Wii with updated roster. Madden 13 Wii U was lacking the game engine that had been introduced for 360/PS3 that dramatically boosted quality of the game. And then Need for Speed Wii U was released six months late and EA had already announced no further support for the system before it launched

The ONLY possible interpretation, at this point, considering that it takes more than 6 months to develop a game, is that EA had already ceased all of their development for the Wii U, with the exception of NFS (which got delayed), prior to launch - it couldn't possibly be anything to do with sales. And since EA are treating me like crap, I'm not going to buy NFS, which was the only "decent" EA title on Wii U, from what I hear. And at this point, it looks like Ubisoft are following suit.

So I'm going to ask you this: why should I support a company that treats me like an undesirable customer, who seems to go out of their way to annoy me? Why should Nintendo system owners buy inferior titles late and at full price to show "support" for the publisher, who would then just use that support to justify more inferior, late titles (like Capcom did with Resident Evil: Umbrella Chronicles on Wii, for instance)? Why do people suggest that it's our fault for not buying their crap?