By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Let's be honest Nintendo's pricing for NES and SNES games is a rip off

Well, you will recieve games like Super Metroid and F-Zero for 30ct for 1 months, that's like SUPER cheap.



Around the Network

Lol the prices are great because they are great games. Hell I'll be paying another $1 to just upgrade them to wiiu gamepad support. Nes SNES games are simply worth more.



Horrorfest said:
badgenome said:
Horrorfest said:

Surely you must be kidding. Are you trying to argue SNES games look better? I could say this same thing but replace PS1 with SNES. Only a few SNES games still look good even today. They are aged 2D games with low quality graphics. Most of the best PS1 games look great today. RE2 and 3 have aged very well. The FF games still look great. PS1 games look awesome on my HDTV. 

I assure you, I have never serious'd moar in my entire life. I own no shortage of PS1 classics, and it has been horrifying to realize that many of my favorite PS1 games have looked and played like absolute garbage this whole time.

You should probably upgrade to a nice TV. It's not the games' fault you have a bad TV. I hear a lot of people say FFVII has aged bad. I would like a remake as much as anyone but it still looks good today, it was released in what 97? It looks AMAZING for it's time. I started off playing that on a standard def TV and I upgraded to a nice big 44 inch 1080p LG TV. It looks literally 10x better on it. I didn't even know that PS3 upgrades old games. I can assure everyone it does. Even Silent Hill with all of it's frustrating controls and animation does look good. Incredible environment detail for it's time and even today. 

44 inch HDTVs playing Final Fantasy 7 look like ass. It probablt looks better than a CRT but I'm telling you, the only way to really play this game now is on a PSP or VIta where the small screen reduces the appearance of the jags. Anything larger and you're going be praying the the AA gods for relief. 



I find PSX games to be much prettier than N64 games for the most part. Star Fox, Banjo Kazooie, Diddy Kong Racing, Blast Corps, Ogre Battle 64, Ocarina of Time, and Majora's Mask are still very nice to look at, but most are not. Resident Evil 2, and 3, the Final Fantasy games, and others, utilize the same type of rendering as Donkey Kong Country and are still very beautiful today.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Horrorfest said:
Surely you must be kidding. Are you trying to argue SNES games look better? I could say this same thing but replace PS1 with SNES. Only a few SNES games still look good even today. They are aged 2D games with low quality graphics. Most of the best PS1 games look great today. RE2 and 3 have aged very well. The FF games still look great. PS1 games look awesome on my HDTV.

You *do* realise that game quality isn't equal to graphical quality, right? That, when they said that PS1 games didn't age well, they didn't actually mean that they're graphically worse, but that they feel aged. They feel like old games. When you play almost any PS1 game, it feels like it's an old game. When you play Donkey Kong Country for the SNES, it still feels like a great, new game. A lot of SNES games have this property, especially Nintendo first-party games.

And let's be honest, many SNES games are more expensive on ebay.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Super-Tennis-SNES-Sealed-BRAND-NEW-Super-Nintendo-1991-/150982578851?pt=Video_Games_Games&hash=item23274352a3

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mortal-Kombat-Super-Nintendo-1992-SNES-Game-/281053602643?pt=Video_Games_Games&hash=item417019a353

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Super-Mario-Kart-Cart-Super-Nintendo-SNES-Vintage-Classic-Racing-Original-/300849486637?pt=Video_Games_Games&hash=item460c06db2d

And it's not just a matter of moving the rom over and testing it for gameplay. The games have to be re-classified by the various classification bodies, they have to be tested for security, they have to reobtain any licenses or permissions that were originally required, and they have to incorporate extra features like appropriate save states and restrictions on such states. And with the Wii U, there's more added functionality, too.

And even if none of that was necessary, the prices aren't set based on a single consumer's preconceived idea of how much such games *should* be worth. The prices are dictated by the market, just like with retail games - if you release a game at $50, and it's only really worth $20, the price will drop pretty quickly as sales falter after launch. The publisher makes the call as to what price will maximise their total profit, factoring in reduction of purchases with increasing price. This is basic economics.

It's only a ripoff if a retailer ups the price of a product for their own profit, despite others nearby selling the same product at the normal price, and prey on consumers not being sufficiently well-informed to shop where it's cheaper. That, or intentionally misrepresenting the value of the product.



Around the Network

Thats one of the reasons I never bothered to download NES/SNES games on Wii, awful prices. It should be:

NES/SNES 1.99-2.99
N64 4.99
GC 9.99 (future)



I think they are slightly overpriced. It should be on the 4 mark.

Why because brand new eshop games on the 3DS for example cost 8. It doesnt make sense to charge similar prices on a brand new game on really old and dated games (even if the gameplay is still superb).



I just find it hilarious that people are complaining over such trivial prices. 5 USD is cheaper than dirt, literally.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Yes, they are overpriced. There are some games that I've been willing to pay for due to a mixture of nostalgia, quality or simply because I've just been a bit too drunk, but overall, I just don't see how the digital version of these rather old games can cost that much for consumers.

Obviously people are paying otherwise they wouldn't bother with their pricing scheme, but I don't see their system as being particularly friendly for consumers.



Yes, but for $5, I'm not going to complain too much. Really, games like Zelda and SMB3 are worth the full price of a few popsicle sticks. The only thing that bugs me is when low-quality games or generic games are the full $5. "Golf" should not cost as much as SMB3.