Scoobes said: He was in the right place at the right time. I would say his performance has been pretty average as I don't think he's really changed or improved much. If he wasn't there, I doubt NoA would be doing any worse. On the flip side, I think others could have done a better job and potentially put them in better positions. He just seems to have gone through the motions passively rather then actively pushing products. |
What other NOA president have you compared against? Also, as compared to the NOE and NoAustralia presidents, he seems to be the most actively marketing driven tbh.