Please show a link to the show, because ALL the other scientific literature I have reviewed shows the opposite.

That having two Dads or two Moms show a negligible chance that their child will be gay. 

In addition most kids I know raise by same sex parents are strait.

It sounds invented for a target audience .  Like that fake ‘historian’ that is trying to ruin PBS or something Pat Robinson would make up.  Robinson said, “9/11 was caused by People for the American Way” and other such data errors.

OR Do you really think being gay is contagious?

It's easier for the parent emotionally. Rather than see something he doesn't agree with, and working to agree with it, it is just easier to forget about one's son, and from the matter of the letter it seems like the father put much contemplation into it. I'd think that once somebody is older, they lose the will to fight for something they believe in, and sometimes its just easier to give up and let things run their course, and if you dislike it, you distance yourself. It depends on the person I'd think, to be honest. 

I'm sad to see this is all you got. I am really not interested on wether you think my post is good or bad, i'm interested in the reasons. You give none, therefore you got no case. The forum isnt a place where you put out your frustrations. If you dont have a case, dont bother replying to my post, otherwise its just trolling is it not?

Seriously this is how disappointment sounds. I dont read HATE in there. He even wishes his son a good life etc.

But on the other hand posting this private letter so the whole world can see it is just personal revenge and is idiotic and childish. Whats the purpose other than showing the world how STUPID his father was? Just because a father disowned his son its not okay to act as stupid as the father did.

I mean the SON wants to change the father so the father lives a more open lifestyle and accepts the gay son and the father wants to change the son so the son is more "normal".

They are even. There is no point in changing people go and find friends etc that accept you the way you are and stop constantly whining about how hard something is and stop trying to shape the world as you want it to be.
The longer someone lives a certain lifestyle the harder it is to change it so the son should know that this could have happened. The father on the other hand was also blind and thought he could fix the mistake his "young" "stupid" son did.

Agree or disagree as much as you want but for me the son is an uber idiot no matter what his father did or didn't do.

its always easy to talk shit but experiencing stuff is different. I have a really bad relationship with my father. Who cares?  Im a seperate person he is a seperate person. There is no chain  keeping me from living my own life. Sure its not easy and its not fair to have a bad father but thats life. Other people have worse problems  like starving etc. We are just whining because we dont have the PERFECT LIFE as seen on some tv shows or commercials or whatever.

This thread is getting worse and worse.

I find it beyond sad that any parent would take such actions against their own flesh and blood. Being abandoned by your parent for something that you have no control over, for merely being who you are.
It's messed up beyond belief that nothing would have changed between the man and his father had he chosen to live a life full of lies instead.

As i said this was about 15 years ago so have no clue what it was exactly, and as i said i questioned how accurate it was. I also did state tha I believe it is genetic.

also contagious? when did i say that? do you know what influenced means? I gave examples. Kids learn from their parents, which infulences how you will turn out as an adult.

i.e if your father never respected women, chances are you won't either. that becomes a norm for you.

all i asked was people's view on,  if it was possible for some children growing up in a gay environment to think that that is the normal.

That is plain sad, through and through. I'm amazed that people still think harbor bronze age tolerance for their peers and loved one's due to ancient texts.

You put a homosexual society against a heterosexual society. That's not the point. A society/ecosystem mixed with homesexuals and heterosexuals is the natural way and it is obviously evolutionary superior to the exclusive societies, because mixed societies/ecosystem are what happens to stay in the evolution as we can observe in the nature.

No, you're wrong. You can have Anti-theism without atheism but not without theism.