By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - IGN reviews killzone 2- 9.4/10

Garnett on 29 January 2009
SpartanFX said:

@paladin

 

 

jizz in my pants

Im guessing peter just seen the vid in my sig :)

KZ2 FTW!!!!!!

 



*Remember when the world was supposed to end on May 21st, 2011? Well click here to see our short parody video of it [not]ending*

Around the Network
Kzoellner on 29 January 2009

bonus



SpartanFX on 29 January 2009
Garnett said:
SpartanFX said:

@paladin

 

 

jizz in my pants

Im guessing peter just seen the vid in my sig :)

KZ2 FTW!!!!!!

 

 

loool,,,see what your sig does to people man. XD



 

 

 

Zucas on 29 January 2009

After reading it the score seems quite reasonable. Of course still haven't played the game but a solid 9.4 from what they were saying seemed fair.



Blacksaber on 29 January 2009

I was .1 to high in my prediction >_>



Former something....

Around the Network
SpartanFX on 29 January 2009

@zucas

 

are u ever planing on joining our KZ clan?

never?
after a price drop?



 

 

 

Zucas on 29 January 2009

I think my only problem with this is its later January and this game doesn't release till late February. Reviews should time the reviews at the earliest a week before it releases. Otherwise it seems like they are hyping it rather than critiquing it.



SpartanFX on 29 January 2009

@zucas well gurrilla has removed the embargo



 

 

 

makingmusic476 on 29 January 2009
Dodece said:
Be mindful to withhold judgment until the game gets closer to release. It is common practice in the industry to mandate a certain review score from third parties that obtain early access. The publisher can dictate to the reviewers, and it has happened quite often.

This is a classic trap that members fall into time and again. They rush to judge, because reviewers play ball with publishers. Then the game is released and a number of reviews arrive that pull the score down. The result is that sometimes a game that is highly acclaimed early on can end up with sub par averages.

Not saying this is the case, but it is always better to be safe then Sorry. Better to not set your expectations too high. There could still be a number of reviewers that are not enthralled by the game that have their mouths taped shut. In fact the longer it takes more reviews to appear the more likely this is the case.

 

The review embargo ended for every reviewer that got a copy of the review build, which included just about every damn website and magazines I can think of (including obscure Swedish and Croatian mags, just check the official thread).  The only exclusive review this game had was from OPM US.

Even now that Eurogamer and IGN have reviewed the game, people are still doubting.



makingmusic476 on 29 January 2009

I think it deserved higher than Resistance 2, based on the beta, but a 9.4 is still great.

I expect the game to have a much higher metacritic average than Resistance 2, however (by at least 4 points).