By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - which do you prefer "gameplay or story" before purchasing a game?

Story per say, but really for me it's all about atmosphere and vibe, I can handle mediocre gameplay as long as the game makes me feel something special. Some games are just plain fun though, and don't need a good story, but vibe is everything, I hate games like Doom, Quake, Mortal Kombat or any generic PC shooter/rpg made by narrow minded programmers, cuz the vibe in those games is just so damn bad, i hate angry for the sake of angry and the hole techno punk style.



Around the Network

obviously gameplay, would you buy the shittiest, most problem filled game even if it had a good story?



Naum said:
Gameplay first story second.

I mean a good story but horrible gameplay? = me not finish game

Good gameplay but horrible story? = I can still enjoy it and love it ( Super Mario Galaxy anyone?)

Agreed

Exact reason why I couldn't bring myself to finish Mass Effect.  Great story, bad combat system

 



Gameplay. If the story is awsome but you the gameplay sucks, it's just not fun.



 Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."                               

story is very important to me, but I think gameplay takes the cake.



Around the Network

I like to have both but I think story could be more important in some genre's.

For example, in an FPS game, I couldn't care less about the story, just let me blow things up and make it look cool but I'd be in pain trying to finish a JRPG with a bad story.

Also, sometimes when the gameplay gets stale, only the story can keep the player engaged



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Gameplay is more important than anything. A game needs at least good controls and needs to be fun. Story usually comes before graphics. It depends on the game, of course. For an RPG, story comes after gameplay. For a music game, music comes after gameplay. For a 3rd person shooter...oh wait, I don't like those games on consoles because they have bad gameplay (broken or complicated controls, at least for all that I have tried).

I tend to like platformers, puzzle, strategy, fighting, racing, and RPGs most and out of all those, RPGs are usually the only games with decent stories. Games like Tetris, Civilization 2, and SSBB might be my favorite games, but they have horrible stories and amazing gameplay. In fact, I found the story of SSBB to be even worse than most fighting games, oh well :)



 

Tired of big government?
Want liberty in your lifetime?
Join us @
http://www.freestateproject.org

Riachu said:
Garcian Smith said:
ecurbj said:
So how would you explain a RPG?

Usually also targeted toward teenagers. Very few RPGs have a good enough story to spark your average adult's interest.

 

A lot of WRPGs have very mature stories and there are even a few JRPGs that have mature storytelling i.e. Shin Megami Tensei series, Lost Odyssey

 

 

Thus why I said, "very few." And in that few, about 95% of them are Western-developed.

I'll agree that Nocturne and Digital Devil Saga are obviously intended for adults (the cannibalism/sexual/philosophical undertones make them rather unsuited for teenagers), but Lost Odyssey? I don't know. I just went back to read about a half-dozen reviews, and most of them called it cliche as hell.



"'Casual games' are something the 'Game Industry' invented to explain away the Wii success instead of actually listening or looking at what Nintendo did. There is no 'casual strategy' from Nintendo. 'Accessible strategy', yes, but ‘casual gamers’ is just the 'Game Industry''s polite way of saying what they feel: 'retarded gamers'."

 -Sean Malstrom

 

 

Garcian Smith said:
Riachu said:
Garcian Smith said:
ecurbj said:
So how would you explain a RPG?

Usually also targeted toward teenagers. Very few RPGs have a good enough story to spark your average adult's interest.

 

A lot of WRPGs have very mature stories and there are even a few JRPGs that have mature storytelling i.e. Shin Megami Tensei series, Lost Odyssey

 

 

Thus why I said, "very few." And in that few, about 95% of them are Western-developed.

I'll agree that Nocturne and Digital Devil Saga are obviously intended for adults (the cannibalism/sexual/philosophical undertones make them rather unsuited for teenagers), but Lost Odyssey? I don't know. I just went back to read about a half-dozen reviews, and most of them called it cliche as hell.

Lost Odyssey's tone is fairly mature(atleast for a T rated game anyway)

 



FreeTalkLive said:
Gameplay is more important than anything. A game needs at least good controls and needs to be fun. Story usually comes before graphics. It depends on the game, of course. For an RPG, story comes after gameplay. For a music game, music comes after gameplay. For a 3rd person shooter...oh wait, I don't like those games on consoles because they have bad gameplay (broken or complicated controls, at least for all that I have tried).

I tend to like platformers, puzzle, strategy, fighting, racing, and RPGs most and out of all those, RPGs are usually the only games with decent stories. Games like Tetris, Civilization 2, and SSBB might be my favorite games, but they have horrible stories and amazing gameplay. In fact, I found the story of SSBB to be even worse than most fighting games, oh well :)

Not true.  In fact, games like MGS4, BioShock, and God of War have better storytelling overall than most RPGs with a few exceptions i.e. Mass Effect