So you did not suggest that FFXV RE reviewers did not take into account the content that was added to the older version?
You mention 'read between the lines', but how else am I supposed to know why you're bringing up content added to the previous version through updates/DLC, when you didn't explain how you think this affects the review process?
You do something simple you ask.
The confusing part is not what I've said it's people using XV because when you say older version it's means nothing when that version has the same content you're arguing in comparison to the version reviewed at launch while we're looking at the version when RE released when you're comparing them. Reading your other reply is what actually helped me understand what you're trying to argue.
If I'm already feeling bad about adding posts to an off topic discussion, and I think it seems likely you mean one thing, I'd rather address it right away.
Last edited by Hiku - on 27 September 2019
If I'm wrong, no problem. Just tell me what you actually meant.
But if you don't, and instead focus on bashing the poster for it, it'll just take longer.
Regarding your second paragraph here, I'm still not sure why you think this 'means nothing' when reviewing the game, considering reviews of games with nothing but identical content to the previous version receiving the same scores.
Though maybe that's best to start a new thread over, if you guys still want to discuss this in depth.
Though I understand and agree with the point you made about the time passing since the release of the original working as a negative against it.