Azuren said:
You are, but why would you admit it? No, instead you'd rather deflect to asking me if I'd let my daughter date him. Good on you. As expected of someone who goes by the name "Machiavellian". Now put those goalposts back. He didn't say maybe. He said he assumes some are good people among those coming into the country illegally. Out of context or in this conversation if you said "maybe your mom is not a whore", then you'd probably get a warning or a ban. Now, a discussion concerning a rise in prostitution among 50-60 women that included that? I'd assume it meant you didn't think my mom was a whore. What's that? A comment on a Trump policy instead of just calling him racist? Color me surprised. I'm not an economist, but I would assume the President of the United States (who has shown in the past that he defers to the wisdom of people who know what they're doing, such as with his chance from a wall to a fence at the suggestion of border control) would probably have a guy in his cabinet who knows a little more about economics than I, a dip who just gets exhausted from all the Trump Anxiety people try to spread, or you, a guy who thought the name Machiavellian was a good faith name for someone arguing politics. And then a 180 back to the inane. What's amoral about a wall? What about their plans are stupid?
|
What is the point of the wall if you have them crossing border and waiting next to wall to be captured. They cross Rio Grande in TX and walk along wall till border patrol shows up. What will more walls do? Now we have reports of US camps overcrowded and too lazy to even cook freezer food. Supposedly we are just throwing uncooked freezer food at them. Here take a frozen tater tot and enjoy.
Look I'm all for stopping a shitload of illegals coming through but a wall isn't going to solve the problem. I guess administration thought if we turned into Japanese internment camps but worse it would discourage them but it didn't work.