Hey, there's this DeviantArt user I met who made some of my favorite Krystal fanart, but then he did a piece of what he said is supposed to be Krystal's daughter, in a way that's rather questionable.

I can't share it here because of VGChartz rules and regulations, so what should I do? I've already unfavourited his art that I previously added, and even though I reported the creepy picture twice it hasn't been taken down. The guy still insists it's not sexualizing a minor but I still call bullshit.

What else can I do? -_-

PM sent (Substance) ~ CGI

you mean michael jackson?

Be less politically correct and realize that there's more to life than black and white.

You can like parts of an artist's work and dislike other parts. It's not all or nothing. Similarly, you can like the job an artist does, but don't have to approve of the artist's actions outside of their occupation.

No, I mean, well, I don't know if I should say his name because I don't wanna ruin his life or anything.

Maybe if I showed you in an e-mail you'd change your mind.

Why do you care? If it's just drawings etc., no one got hurt. You don't have to like it but I don't see much reason to do anything about it - unless maybe if it's illegal where you live, in which case it might still be a battle you can't win because we're talking about the internet here.

Why would I?

If I stopped playing Nintendo games altogether because some character designs in Xenoblade Chronicles 2 are too sexualized, I'd hope that you say that makes no sense, because oversexualisation in one piece of work doesn't suddenly make all games detestable.

I care because of the pain done to child molestation victims by people who'd do this sort of picture with real children.

The thing is the sexier characters in Xenoblade Chronicles 2 aren't under 18, and it's not about the games' content it's about someone's fanart.

Fine, if this doesn't work, we'll try your way. Send me a PM with links to one Krystal image that you liked and the image of Krystal's daughter that is the issue. You got me curious about what kind of difference this is about.

Check your inbox, and I apologize if either of us end up with a visit from the FBI.

I have a hard time understanding why you liked that fanart in the first place. You sent me four images.

1. Krystal in a sexual pose. She is a blue fox, so based on this first impression I asked myself if you are a creep.

2. Krystal with a birthday cake. Harmless.

3. Krystal in a fighting pose for Super Smash Bros. The best image from a quality standpoint, but I still wouldn't call it good.

4. Krysi from behind in a suit with camel toe to the max. I must say that this is probably the first time that you didn't overexaggerate. The artist uses the adjective 'adorable' to describe his work. The same word is used is in the comments section of the first image, so I guess that's a common code word in those fanart circles.

Not a bad idea to cut all ties with that guy, because nothing of value is lost. Originally I assumed that his normal fanart is of good quality, but that's not the case.