Fine, if this doesn't work, we'll try your way. Send me a PM with links to one Krystal image that you liked and the image of Krystal's daughter that is the issue. You got me curious about what kind of difference this is about.
Check your inbox, and I apologize if either of us end up with a visit from the FBI.
I have a hard time understanding why you liked that fanart in the first place. You sent me four images.
1. Krystal in a sexual pose. She is a blue fox, so based on this first impression I asked myself if you are a creep.
2. Krystal with a birthday cake. Harmless.
3. Krystal in a fighting pose for Super Smash Bros. The best image from a quality standpoint, but I still wouldn't call it good.
4. Krysi from behind in a suit with camel toe to the max. I must say that this is probably the first time that you didn't overexaggerate. The artist uses the adjective 'adorable' to describe his work. The same word is used is in the comments section of the first image, so I guess that's a common code word in those fanart circles.
Not a bad idea to cut all ties with that guy, because nothing of value is lost. Originally I assumed that his normal fanart is of good quality, but that's not the case.