You are an incredibly hilarious person omg. You're literally doing exactly what I described in the comment you quoted. What's hilarious is that it seems you genuinely don't know you are.
You picked out parts without taking it as a whole which is consistent with your history, I'm not surprised but disappointed that you don't even try to change it up. If you actually look at what I said I was speaking about what you do in general it's not specific to this thread but it does still apply.
@bolded is especially funny because what you constantly contradict "actual reality" because "muh feelings" or other excuses you come up with.
@bolded/italicized you should take your own advice because if you did you wouldn't be saying half the stuff you continue to say.
You say the whole point of this is to see if this "idea" can actually work. What idea? Transgenderism?? Well if that's all then, yeah, it actually does work, take it from a trans person like myself. Case closed. You're done here you've got your answer, do with it what you will.
"You picked out parts without taking it as a whole which is consistent with your history"
well obviously because I posted multiple quotes I'd try to extract the portion that is relevant to the point I'm making, are you arguing that I'm misinterpreting what is said? ok lets use your whole post as an example
"You can be trans and not transition. Moreover, you can be trans and not want to transition. Some trans people transition and then later realize they didn't have to and regret it after, they're an extreme minority but it happens and it doesn't make them any less trans. Some people need to learn what it actually means to be trans."
ok so my argument is that you are dismissing biology because you are stating here that the only thing taken into consideration is 'identity"
this was my original assertion, can you explain for me how I've mischaracterised the claim you've made?
"is especially funny because what you constantly contradict "actual reality""
can you give an example?
"You say the whole point of this is to see if this "idea" can actually work. What idea?"
that the classification of man and woman can simply be ascertained through self declaration regardless of the biological state of the person
this man did so
then later admitted that he wasn't being serious in order to point out how illogical the idea is, but suppose he didn't admit to being dishonest? I mean examples like this should easily demonstrate I would think that there are issues with this idea
the fact of the matter is that we do not interact with the world around us simply through our "identity", but we interact with the world through our bodies which are the result of biological processes, its insane to try to argue that this is irrelevant in my opinion
the other thing is what does this mean for other identities? what if this man who is obviously fat
wanted to instead identify as having this type of body?
shouldn't he be able to under this idea?Last edited by o_O.Q - on 04 September 2019