Then tell them not to and vote them out if they don't listen.

I wasn't serious, that's why I made the joke about why guilty verdicts aren't trending, as if the decisions are being made by the public socially. That and since it seemed like there was actually more than enough hard evidence against Smollett, and how he blamed the corrupt system, which is what it seems he used to get away with it, makes me wonder if the world really is flat and upside down, because the laws and rules don't seem to always apply, even though we're told they do.

this is what people that constantly agitate for going overboard in the pursuit of ending discrimination do not understand - you leave the door wide open for trolls and insincere people to exploit the agenda for their own personal gain

look at what the notion of "believe women" has done, its now empowered many unscrupulous women to feign victimhood for personal gain because they know that they now have a cloak of invulnerability, ironically because of their sex from people who are trying to end sexism... its mindbogglingly incoherent

https://youtu.be/LzejJ_IZBVU

Disgusting.

She's such a POS. Dumb as a post too. I'm tempted to count how many times in that video, she flashes that stupid grin of hers while responding to a question with a non-answer.

But the term "Believe women" is an extreme on itself that only focusses on one part of the problem as it only envelops one gender.

And if a term focusses on a problem that is common for both genders but chooses to only focus on one side of it then it can even be considered sexist,and it is a fractured point to make when you start it with dividing people.

Edit: everyone knows that people claims should not simple be dismissed nor believed without evidence but investigated but that is only logical and does not connect to the separation of genders within that term you defend so can you atleast explain why a "believe women" or a believe men" is needed but not just "believe people" ?

Bolded: Nothing scientific to ever prove that claim,only emotions and even that thought can be considered sexist.If i tell you men tend to struggle more with those kind of things and maybe make a group of people to follow me would that be enough incentive for you to believe it?

Believe women is a slogan and not a movement,it is used by the overused "me too" movement but that does not make that slogan a movement.

"US Department of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos is cutting her departments annual grant of $15-18 million to the Special Olympics"

she's probably just trying to suppress the creation of unnatural hierarchies where there are a few winners and many many losers, so you should be in support of this

"Alabama Congressman Mo Brooks reads from Hitler's 'Mein Kampf' on the House floor in an attempt to denigrate Democrats and their democratic socialist polices."

how could he do that? this makes it sound like some of the policies of the democrats are similar to those of hitler

"Pennsylvania state Representative Stephanie Borowicz gave a "God forgive us prayer" on the House floor prior to the swearing in of Movita Johnson-Harrell, the first Muslim women to join the state House."

and i suppose the muslim lady is just naturally more tolerant of christians because we all know how much more tolerant islam is in general

"Senator Mike Lee from Utah tried to downplay the democrat's Green New Deal by using pictures of a tauntaun from Star Wars, AquaMan, babies and even former president Ronald Reagan with a rocket launcher strapped to his back, shooting an Uzi while riding a velociraptor who is carrying a war torn US flag."

...its what you call a joke

First bolded: My heart goes out for all of the victims and i would say that women have the "weaker" Physical build of the 2 genders and that could translate in more victims but women also tend to report alot more while men on the otherhand tend to keep quiet about it,so yeah i partly agree with that but not with the source you have your info from because it is not a source but a translation from mostly only female writers and first thing i noticed was that Trump reference ?

On the other hand ,even when women have a weaker physical build it says nothing about abusement in a relationship itself and abusive women tend to mentally abuse their men and break them to the point they  can not defend themselves physically when receiving physical abuse and it is not baked into our culture for men to report that so i still think"believe women" is unneeded division of genders for this topic.

Second bolded:I can just ask the same of you,"i need some proof" and till now there is nothing concrete yet just "believe" like you said.

I had to read that a couple of times before I understood the general sentiment he was going for. This is borderline incoherent. It's rants like these that make me question if he might not maybe have dementia.