Quantcast
The US Politics |OT|

Forums - Politics Discussion - The US Politics |OT|

today youtuber upload



My xbl:dx11332sega

My second Xbl:Segasaturnsan

My psn:Segasaturnsan

My Nintendo Friend Code:1302-4985-4999

My Steam:dx11332sega

My youtube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2EeIs1FP89Oz7du7IAEbqg?view_as=subscriber

Around the Network

This just in. CNN is still race baiting by saying Trump has too many white lawyers LMAO.

Mainstream media only see race, they don't see people.






Radek said:

This just in. CNN is still race baiting by saying Trump has too many white lawyers LMAO.

Mainstream media only see race, they don't see people.

Hasn't CNN made it clear enough that Trump is the biggest racist ever?

Yet CNN wonders why he doesn't have a multicultural group defending him?

This just in at CNN, Israel lacks German military generals.



The Canadian National Anthem According To Justin Trudeau

 

Oh planet Earth! The home of native lands, 
True social law, in all of us demand.
With cattle farts, we view sea rise,
Our North sinking slowly.
From far and snide, oh planet Earth, 
Our healthcare is yours free!
Science save our land, harnessing the breeze,
Oh planet Earth, smoke weed and ferment yeast.
Oh planet Earth, ell gee bee queue and tee.

Our president of the United States, ladies and gentlemen:



Massimus - "Trump already has democrat support."

Around the Network

I've read that apparantly the President of Ukraine had no idea aid was delayed until it was reported. If it's true the whole impeachment feels like a scam.



jason1637 said:
I've read that apparantly the President of Ukraine had no idea aid was delayed until it was reported. If it's true the whole impeachment feels like a scam.

Imagine being the president of Ukraine in early 2019 and having your aid held hostage by the US president...who could remain the US president for possibly 5 more years.  Now, do you really want to speak out against that guy?



Massimus - "Trump already has democrat support."

SpokenTruth said:
jason1637 said:
I've read that apparantly the President of Ukraine had no idea aid was delayed until it was reported. If it's true the whole impeachment feels like a scam.

Imagine being the president of Ukraine in early 2019 and having your aid held hostage by the US president...who could remain the US president for possibly 5 more years.  Now, do you really want to speak out against that guy?

Probably not but if you can't prove a quid pro quo then why was he impeached? Also apparently the house did not follow proper supena process by holding a vote and taking executive privilege to the court. This whole thing seemed rushed and not fledged out tbh.



jason1637 said:
SpokenTruth said:

Imagine being the president of Ukraine in early 2019 and having your aid held hostage by the US president...who could remain the US president for possibly 5 more years.  Now, do you really want to speak out against that guy?

Probably not but 1) if you can't prove a quid pro quo then why was he impeached? Also apparently the house 2) did not follow proper supena process by holding a vote and 3) taking executive privilege to the court. This whole thing seemed rushed and not fledged out tbh.

1). Imagine withholding all the evidence and then saying prove it. 

2). That's a minor technicality and using it as your entire defense is foolish.

3). You don't need to take it to court.  Congress has the sole power of impeachment and in the US vs Nixon (1974), the Supreme Court ruled that executive privilege does not have priority over an impeachment proceeding.

Last edited by SpokenTruth - on 27 January 2020

Massimus - "Trump already has democrat support."

SpokenTruth said:
jason1637 said:

Probably not but 1) if you can't prove a quid pro quo then why was he impeached? Also apparently the house 2) did not follow proper supena process by holding a vote and 3) taking executive privilege to the court. This whole thing seemed rushed and not fledged out tbh.

1). Imagine withholding all the evidence and then saying prove it. 

2). That's a minor technicality and using it as your entire defense is foolish.

3). You don't need to take it to court.  Congress has the sole power of impeachment and in the US vs Nixon (1974), the Supreme Court ruled that executive privilege does not have priority over an impeachment proceeding.

1. In a fair investigation or trial lets say someone allegedly assaulted someone but if the person that was allegedly assaulted says that they were not you have no case. You're innocent til proven guilty and if the Ukraine government is saying they had no idea aid was witholded you can't prove a quid pro quo.

2. Thats proper procedure and them not doing it comes across as rushed.

3. Oh okay if that's the case then I do see the case for impeachment under obstruction of justice.