No, MJ was acquitted of all charges.  If anything the Statute of limitations is protecting the 2 in this documentary because they do not have to prove their claims.  

Or because they're both now broke has-beens. 

And they're free from being prosecuted for perjury if they lied in court.

(See! I take everything into account!)

Tom Mesereau, Michael Jackson's defense lawyer, explained why that happened in the Michael Jackson episode of True Crime with Aphrodite Jones.

This explanation is at 33:17 of the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Cn1xQZ-IFc

Ever since more evidence like the Train Station story and the Robson's Grand Canyon trip came out disproving the allegations in the 'documentary', the International Media such as in countries like the U.K., Germany, France, and New Zealand (from what I've heard) have been jumping all over those latest reports. Meanwhile, most, if not all, of the mainstream U.S. media has been painfully quiet... USA Today? Wall Street Journal? New York Times? They were all quick to jump on the Leaving Neverland bandwagon. But now that the legitimacy of that documentary has been called out, revealed to have major credibility issues, and is now getting thrown in the wood-chipper. (crickets).
I didn't think it would be possible, but I finally agree with Donald Trump on something, the headache inducing joke that is the mainstream U.S. media. Fake News, indeed.

Even Oprah Winfrey, who did her After Neverland special where she allowed Dan Reed, Wade Robson, and James Safechuck to come on her show and gave them a platform to share their stories. She (or whoever is in charge of her social media accounts) deleted all her posts on Social Media about her special and the 'documentary', and she (or whoever is in charge of her YouTube page) deleted the videos she had related to those subjects from her YouTube playlist. I don't know about you guys or what her reasoning may be behind that, but that sure looks like Damage Control to me.

Has she interviewed Taj or Brandi Jackson? Neither one of them have made any mention of it if she has. Jermaine? Tito? Randy? Janet? Katherine? Any Jackson family member at all? Scott Ross, the Private Investigator for the 2005 trial? Tom Messereau, Michael's Defense Lawyer for the 2005 trial? Mike Smallcombe, the guy who debunked the Train Station story? Or any other defender of Michael to report the other side of the story since Michael is no longer here to defend himself? Especially in the wake of these revelations? Has she even tried? Still waiting, Oprah.

Of course he was pedophile, but the majority of people will always want to believe he was innocent.

The question mark is there for a reason. It's the difference between a statement and a question. I heard about the child erotica stories but I never bothered to investigate them, hence, the question mark. 

But it's great how you cherry picked child erotica out of the list and ignored the rest.

Ofcourse he was innocent. He was rich!

The below explains everything by way of an actual confession..This is a must see video..Very revealing :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6p8CgdRLnDQ

LMAO! That video kept popping up in my recommendations a couple of weeks ago. When I finally watched it, I DIED! Wanted to hate it but I couldn't.