Fallout 76 takes the cake, followed by MG Survive and then Atlas. AAA devs should never stoop so low as to what some indie devs like the ones behind Atlas churn out.

Fallout 76 put emphasis on the stuff i hated about 4 and didnt even run properly to booth

That definitely makes a very strong case for Atlas, but as horrifically janky as it looks, Ark on Switch looks just as janky and even uglier, and as much as I loathe shoddiness, I loathe pretentious wankery in equal measure, so I still think Ark Switch and the Quiet Man are contenders.

Shaq Fu: A Legend Reborn for me.

Clumsy action, recycled enemies, tedious gameplay, juvenile, tired, and offensive humor.

out of actual working ones? MG Survive, out of ones that want to be a game that try to work? 76

Hunt Down the Freeman

I forgot that came out in 2018.

But really, what did you expect from a sequel to a game so bad there was a website dedicated to destroying every existing copy? :P

For me it was Dynasty Warriors 9.

If judging the game alone, I'd have to say Ark on Switch. The performance of that game is absolutely horrendous, and I can't stand to even look at this animated oil painting, let alone play it.

But judging both the games and everything surrounding it? Fallout 76 by far. I have NEVER seen a company so thoroughly make an ass out of themselves over and over like this. Well, maybe Intel, but even they did it over the course of 2 years (2017 and 2018). These guys did it with 1 game, over a span of less than 2 months. And it might not even be over.

Interesting. I'd heard the framerate is awful, anything else that kills it besides the repetitive gameplay that's pretty much a series staple?