By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Marvel's Spider-Man: The Complete Digital Foundry Analysis!

"Everything you need to know about the technology behind Marvel's Spider-Man for PlayStation 4, along with detailed comparisons with the much-debated E3 2017 demo. How has Spider-Man changed over the last year - and why? "

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2wr7vebb6Y

Spoiler : It's an upgrade , not a downgrade



Around the Network

And they won't be able to do their infamous comparisons with other platforms =p

Great there won't be those silly downgrade accusations as well.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

DonFerrari said:
And they won't be able to do their infamous comparisons with other platforms =p

Great there won't be those silly downgrade accusations as well.

I can confirm it runs like shit on PC. Definitely a downgrade.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

It May be an upgrade but it has to few puddles though. Puddles need to be represented fairly.



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar

Upgrade/Downgrade, who cares.

What is conclusion in video. Is it native 4k 60fps, 1080p 60fps, 900 60fps, 1080 30 fps, ect.

What is the resolution, and frames per second and is it steady or dips?

Never care if the game looks like an 8 bit game or a graphic powerhouse. The important part beyond gameplay is if it runs smoothly or not.



Around the Network

Holy shit it's an upgrade? The insomnigods do it again!



vivster said:
DonFerrari said:
And they won't be able to do their infamous comparisons with other platforms =p

Great there won't be those silly downgrade accusations as well.

I can confirm it runs like shit on PC. Definitely a downgrade.

Kkkkk who need all those box marks on the game... PC version sucks =p

irstupid said:
Upgrade/Downgrade, who cares.

What is conclusion in video. Is it native 4k 60fps, 1080p 60fps, 900 60fps, 1080 30 fps, ect.

What is the resolution, and frames per second and is it steady or dips?

Never care if the game looks like an 8 bit game or a graphic powerhouse. The important part beyond gameplay is if it runs smoothly or not.

It is a type of temporal injection that goes from like 1300p to 1900p. Steady 30fps except very minor hiccups.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Already digitally pre-ordered the best version. I want to go into it cold with no info but I've been playing Amazing Spider-Man 2 to kill time before the release. I'm curious how big of an upgrade this one is. I'm surprised how similar both games are, based on the limited videos I've seen one the past year or so.



mZuzek loves Smeags. 😢

DonFerrari said:
vivster said:

I can confirm it runs like shit on PC. Definitely a downgrade.

Kkkkk who need all those box marks on the game... PC version sucks =p

irstupid said:
Upgrade/Downgrade, who cares.

What is conclusion in video. Is it native 4k 60fps, 1080p 60fps, 900 60fps, 1080 30 fps, ect.

What is the resolution, and frames per second and is it steady or dips?

Never care if the game looks like an 8 bit game or a graphic powerhouse. The important part beyond gameplay is if it runs smoothly or not.

It is a type of temporal injection that goes from like 1300p to 1900p. Steady 30fps except very minor hiccups.

How does DF do videos these days with all the consoles. Do they list every single one. In this case it's only two

PS4

PS4 Pro

But otherwise do they list those two, xbox ones, xbox one X, ect.

Also, are your number for the standard ps4 or the pro? I assume pro, seeing as they are higher than 1080p. So what is ps4 normal? Is there performance mode, ect? Really miss the good old days of only one system. Recall arguments back in the da about how consoles are better than PC's because of x and y reason. Funny that 90% of those reasons no longer exist because the consoles do them now. Big downloads, patches, installs, different performances systems, drm, online, ect.



irstupid said:
DonFerrari said:

Kkkkk who need all those box marks on the game... PC version sucks =p

It is a type of temporal injection that goes from like 1300p to 1900p. Steady 30fps except very minor hiccups.

How does DF do videos these days with all the consoles. Do they list every single one. In this case it's only two

PS4

PS4 Pro

But otherwise do they list those two, xbox ones, xbox one X, ect.

Also, are your number for the standard ps4 or the pro? I assume pro, seeing as they are higher than 1080p. So what is ps4 normal? Is there performance mode, ect? Really miss the good old days of only one system. Recall arguments back in the da about how consoles are better than PC's because of x and y reason. Funny that 90% of those reasons no longer exist because the consoles do them now. Big downloads, patches, installs, different performances systems, drm, online, ect.

They either do one on one battles or multiple, their title or description would tell it.

Both have the consistent fps.

On resolution PS4 is 900p to 1080p.

Haven't seem they talk about performance mode and since it is basically locked doesn't seem like necessary at all. But you can turn on and of chromatic aberration, and select motion blur 1-10 and film granularity.

Yes since X360 and customer acceptance of how it done things, now we basically have PCs on a closed environment.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994