Because it takes years before any policy starts to make a difference.  Even during Bush years, it took years for his administration before we saw the result of policies that caused problems.  Now that you have these tariffs was about to happen.  You have instability in trade going on between US, Mexico and Canada.  We will see if these actual policy changes will benefit or have a huge detriment to our economy.  Not sure why people always believe things like the economy just blow up in an instant.  It take years of bad policy to shift an economyto good or bad.  By the time Trump serve out his 4 years we should start to see the results of things he has put into motion.

Of course you over-exagerated to prove your point.

I would have said anything before the 7.5% or so rate it not worth consider as it was just the market/world/rate/ect whatever you want to call it righting itself out.

It's like when a stock take a huge crash or dive. It drops so far due to over-reaction and that is not what it's true value really is. For that reason, the stock market now a days actually closes when there is a huge drop. The great recession one could say was like that. Beyond allt he businesses that went out of business, many other over-reacted and played it essentially safe by letting more go than needed, or froze hiring to be safe, ect. 

So then Obama improved from the 8-7.5 to roughly 5. That is great. Where ever you want to say it starts. the average per year historically is probably closer to 6 than 5 and he ended at five. So success.

But just look at your data. It looks to be leveling off at 5, until Trump takes office and then it takes a sharp hit down to 4.  WHY? Was it because still Obama's policies? If you're going to argue that, then you can't be spouting how Trumps' goal and only thing he has done in office is been repeal everything Obama has done. How can stuff be still improving due to Obama if all Trump has done is reversed Obama's legacy?

And don't say "oh, Obama's would have gone to this low 4" That is a baseless claim. Go look at historical data, and you will see how rare being in the 4's or lower is. If Trump was such a disaster, regardless of who was before him, this coveted and rare 4% should not be possible. Obama ended at great numbers. It would be almost expected that anyone following him would have worse numbers just on that fact alone. 

Unemployment went down during Obama’s term because people completely dropped out of the workforce lmao. That graph shows absolutely nothing, one statistic with no specifics. To claim the Obama terms had any kind of recovery is crazy! The federal reserve kept negative interest rates so the economy didn’t spiral out of control. What a laughable argument.

You posted a graph showing the unemploymet rate by President, not Congress.

If you were arguing Congress so bad then you would have highlighted that Congress was in power since 2014. So everything since 2014 according to you is 100% thanks to Republicans. 

He's shooting himself in the foot going after Harley-Davidson, as the reason Harley sales are up in Europe is because of the right-wing biker gangs of the SIOE.

Don't know what Trump said, but I did read an article a few days ago about a group of Harley Davidson owners in the US that are really upset that Harley is moving outside the US.

I don't know how loyal Harley fans are to it being a US company, but if they are anything like Ford and Chevy ownners, I would be scared of upsetting them. Bike or Car fanatics are very brand loyal and fight with other companies all the time over who is better and it becoming a foreign brand would be a big blow to many. 

So the question is, will Harley gain enough fans to overcomet he amount they lose. And the hardcore bike/car fans spend ALOT of money on their hobbies. Harley's are NOT cheap either. 

He's going too far, what he is doing with those families by taking their children away is cruel and plain wrong. It's one thing to protect his country from people that follow a dangerous religion by not letting them enter the US territory but it's an entirely different matter when he separates families and takes their children away. Especially latino families, they have nothing to do with terrorism.

I guess we are fucked no matter how an election goes. We either have some sell out that will have the appearance of a civilized person and be corrupt to the bone or some populist that Tweets anything he wants and has the moral abilities of an amoeba.

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-44665112/migrant-mum-called-animal-for-breastfeeding

Not all populists are uncivilized. Just the right wing authoritarian ones. Find a middle of the road populist like Eisenhower or left wing populist like FDR or Teddy Roosevelt and you have a guaranteed top 10 president. Such a shame there's been so few of them. America seems to love them, and they seem to be great for us, you'd think we'd see more of them.

Looks like the tariffs are killing a number of US businesses, including Harley-Davidson.

You have a child who claims to be about lowering taxes, putting up these big tariffs while dumping 200 billion extra into the military-industrial complex, shaking hands with militant countries like Israelis, Russians, the North Korean dictator, and Saudis while fucking the Western economy with these tariffs. It's not difficult to see which industry owns Trump.

I actually thought you were better than this. 

He showed you a timeline by President because you appeared to be making claims about presidents having effects on the economy.  Is that no longer the case? 

(Note: if you really cared about this issue you might have noticed that the color changed on Election Day, not Trump's inauguration.  Did Trump enact his oh-so-efficacious policies on Day 1?  Did he do it before he even took office?  Is it literally his cult of personality buoying the job market?)