You took words out of my months, it surprises me how people will br okay if 95% of Switch line up are ports ... Itd show à big laziness from Nintendo who didnt deliver on WiiU, theyre supposéd to have a lot hidden exclusive projets for Switch ready

So how well did Wii U Sports Club sell? Or Wii Fit U? Nintendo didn't abandon the Blue Ocean, the Blue Ocean crowd abandonned Nintendo. 

It is regarded as one of the best your whole it would sell better argument is quite frankly the most flawed argument anyone can put forward as one the game has outsold the majority of games this gen on the smallest userbase and is one of the best selling games this gen and two the are many high quality games out there that don't sell as much because of numerous factors, sorry mate this argument has no ground.

Wii U games aren't regarded mediocre at best both critics and players say the games are either really good or solid for most part the problem with the Wii U is nothing more than what I mentioned above with droughts and poor handling, I think what this whole case here is you just trying to pass off your own personal opinion as a fact.

NOBODY that I know of is calling Wii U games good or solid. Haha. There may be certain number of apologists saying so, but normal people and gamers, no.

No, if MK8 was a good game, it would move Wii U's. 

So media outlets and people who have actually played them aren't normal people and gamers?

Just accept your opinion is not gospel on this one than trying to attempt damage control and insulting people mate as I've seen people recieve warnings for less.

Pretty sure I read they have more critically acclaimed games above 90 on Metacritic than on any other current gen system.

Mario Kart 8 - 88
Smash 4 - 92
Mario 3D World - 93
Pikmin 3 - 87
Bayonetta 2 - 91
Legend of Zelda Wind Wakewr HD - 90
Super Mario Maker - 88

Etc.
If you haven't heard praise for most of Nintendo's WiiU games, I don't know what to tell you.
Most of Nintendo's biggest titles were not tied to the Gamepad, coincidentally. Besides Star Fox.

As for why a large amount of the Wii crowd went to mobile, I suggest reading one of the many articles on the subject.
But basically, the low entry point and gimmic of the Wii appealed to people who normally don't games. Soccer moms got Wii Fit to get in shape, and the way you play Wii Sports appealed to people who were never invested in consoles or conventional controllers.
On mobile, these easy access, free to play, easy to play games are there in your face, aggressively promoted through social media and the app stores, for free, on a device you already own and use every day. That's why you have 3 Billion downloads for Angry Birds. Yeah, Billions. With a B.

Yeah. I don't think the media outlets are normal people or normal gamers. There don't seem to be that many people that have actually played the games, not to mention people who have played them beyond the first impression.

Well, why not tell me then where can I find this praise. By looking at the real world, nobody seems to care about Wii U, and by looking at the message boards, nobody seems to care about Wii U. Yet, it's supposed to have insanely good games that everybody likes.

There was Starfox and Splatoon, and if I recall, quite a few other games was using the controller as a mandatory controller, at least for multiplayer.

And what might the articles be? Are they made by the Wii crowd or who? I'm personally in the Wii crowd - just like many of my friends - and I really don't see how the free games on mobile would appeal to the Wii crowd in general. Yeah, the mobile games are free but that's just about it. It's not the waste of money were talking about, but waste of time. The soccer moms that were playing Wii Fit to get fit, which games they are now playing on mobile to get fit? Why would Angry Birds appeal to them, but not Splatoon? If there are 3 billion Angry Birds downloads, what's the point in making games like Call of Duty, as COD obviously don't sell the amount of Angry Birds downloads. And, how do you play games like Wii Sports on mobile?

The industry AAA games are not good enough for the Wii audience. We demand better.

You do realize how aggregate review sites work, right? They take the reviews of all the major gaming press and produce an average. Most also include user reviews, which tells you what your average joe thinks of the games. To say that Nintendo has the biggest ratio of highly-rated exclusives goes without saying... though even Sony and Microsoft's execs often put that into words.

Just because the Wii U was a financial failure does not mean that it didn't have some of the best games of the generation. Just think about music and cinema. Many of the best films and albums are flops on their initial release. Popularity depends primarily on market trends, advertising, and how easily digestible that content is to the widest denominator - not the quality of the content.

You do realize how aggregate review sites work, right? They take the reviews of all the major gaming press and produce an average. Most also include user reviews, which tells you what your average joe thinks of the games. To say that Nintendo has the biggest ratio of highly-rated exclusives goes without saying... though even Sony and Microsoft's execs often put that into words.

Just because the Wii U was a financial failure does not mean that it didn't have some of the best games of the generation. Just think about music and cinema. Many of the best films and albums are flops on their initial release. Popularity depends primarily on market trends, advertising, and how easily digestible that content is to the widest denominator - not the quality of the content.

I thought I did show you where the praise is, so I take that as you not being aware of what Metacritic is?
In that case, it's a site that compiles reviews from a number of reputable review outlets, and displays an average review score based on all the reviews.
So if for example Eurogamer, IGN, and Gamespot gave Zelda a 93 score, and The Guardian and Gamereactor gave it a 70, it would have an average of 83.
It's pretty hard to get above 90 these days because there are usually some reviewers who lower the average significantly. Both Final Fantasy XV and The Last Guardian for example ended up on 82. So the fact that Nintendo has several 90+ games, means that they are in fact critically acclaimed as very good games.
http://www.metacritic.com/

And yeah, Splatoon is indeed also a game that needs the Gamepad.

As for articles about the Wii crowd, they've been written by industry analysts and gaming journalists alike. It was a phenomenon that intrigued the whole gaming world. The fact that you are here, posting on this forum, means you are probably not part of that Wii crowd that we're refering to. They were not the only ones who bought the system, after all.
The basic reason as to why they're more interested in Angry Birds than Splatoon is that games like that are free, or very cheap, to download on a device they already use every day. To get Splatoon they need to pay $250+. And since they generally don't have a gaming background, it's difficult to entice them without a message that resonates with them, such as how you played Wii Sports and Wii Fit.

Wii Fit for Wii sold 22.7 Million
Wii Fit for Wii U sold 0.85 Million.

Nintendo are still chasing that ghost from the past, but it seems like a lost cause to try to pry them away from their Candy Crush Sagas on their phones, or Farmville on Facebook, etc. It simply suits them better in most aspects.