By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Ventura Beat: Nintendo Switch are based on Nvidia's Maxwell Architecture not Pascal

Captain_Yuri said:

See the decision is just odd if all this is true.

1 TF With Maxwell? They are basically trying to push more power with an older and less efficient arch on a portable? The Tegra x1 was 512Gflops and this is double that... Like I don't understand the logic behind it cause for battery life, heat and etc, Pascal would be the better choice

I will take it with a grain of salt.

It would certainly fit with Nintendo's favorable stance on old hardware. But yeah, it would actually be ridiculous. Pascal is not that new and Maxwell is absically stone age tech. Would be weird even for Nintendo to go that route.

Then again Nintendo only cares about money and I'm sure they'd get those old Tegra chips for cheap.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Around the Network

what if...
The dev kit is based on maxwell and final product is on pascal?
They are almost the same, for programmers, it soulhd not make any difference.
And the rumors sources would be telling the thruth...about the product they have, the dev kit.
Also, maybe the 3 hours switch batery is with the maxwell dev kit, and the final product may have more time of batery life, because is based on pascal...



vivster said:
Captain_Yuri said:

See the decision is just odd if all this is true.

1 TF With Maxwell? They are basically trying to push more power with an older and less efficient arch on a portable? The Tegra x1 was 512Gflops and this is double that... Like I don't understand the logic behind it cause for battery life, heat and etc, Pascal would be the better choice

I will take it with a grain of salt.

It would certainly fit with Nintendo's favorable stance on old hardware. But yeah, it would actually be ridiculous. Pascal is not that new and Maxwell is absically stone age tech. Would be weird even for Nintendo to go that route.

Then again Nintendo only cares about money and I'm sure they'd get those old Tegra chips for cheap.

Yea but 1 TF? The old Tegra X1 was 500 Gflops. I can understand Maxwell and Tegra X1 but I can't understand Maxwell and 1 TF, specially on a portable device.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Really tired of the rumors or reports, less than a month to know. But tbh after all these months with so many rumors about the hardware i dont care anymore, i just wanna see the games.



onionberry said:
Really tired of the rumors or reports, less than a month to know. But tbh after all these months with so many rumors about the hardware i dont care anymore, i just wanna see the games.

I felt this way until the teaser. Now I'm aching for any news again.



Around the Network
Captain_Yuri said:
vivster said:

It would certainly fit with Nintendo's favorable stance on old hardware. But yeah, it would actually be ridiculous. Pascal is not that new and Maxwell is absically stone age tech. Would be weird even for Nintendo to go that route.

Then again Nintendo only cares about money and I'm sure they'd get those old Tegra chips for cheap.

Yea but 1 TF? The old Tegra X1 was 500 Gflops. I can understand Maxwell and Tegra X1 but I can't understand Maxwell and 1 TF, specially on a portable device.

Where did you get the 1TFLOPS from?



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

vivster said:
Captain_Yuri said:

Yea but 1 TF? The old Tegra X1 was 500 Gflops. I can understand Maxwell and Tegra X1 but I can't understand Maxwell and 1 TF, specially on a portable device.

Where did you get the 1TFLOPS from?

In the Article

"To give you a sense, we expect the Nintendo Switch to be more than 1 teraflop in performance"



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Going with older, cheaper tech does fit Nintendo's MO for the past 12 years, so I wouldn't be at all surprised if Switch's GPU is a modified Tegra X1.



Captain_Yuri said:
vivster said:

Where did you get the 1TFLOPS from?

In the Article

"To give you a sense, we expect the Nintendo Switch to be more than 1 teraflop in performance"

You didn't read the subtext though. It clearly says: "... and we base this on absolutely nothing because we're a bunch of monkeys." Right there between the lines.

I mean they say this and then they say they don't know if it will be more powerful than X1. Monkeys and typewriters, dude.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

vivster said:
Captain_Yuri said:

In the Article

"To give you a sense, we expect the Nintendo Switch to be more than 1 teraflop in performance"

You didn't read the subtext though. It clearly says: "... and we base this on absolutely nothing because we're a bunch of monkeys." Right there between the lines.

I mean they say this and then they say they don't know if it will be more powerful than X1. Monkeys and typewriters, dude.

Damn, how could I have missed that? Silly me xD



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850