Aura7541 said:
Check the URL address. The article is under the Comic Riffs section, meaning that it's satire. |
Ah ok, thanks for clarifying
Aura7541 said:
Check the URL address. The article is under the Comic Riffs section, meaning that it's satire. |
Ah ok, thanks for clarifying
poklane said:
Ah ok, thanks for clarifying |
So the question is why did satire get approved on MC?
MetaCritic is a joke, what a bunch of idiot people, they should just be fired.
CosmicSex said:
So the question is why did satire get approved on MC? |
Because meta approvals are joke.
iNathan said: MetaCritic is a joke, what a bunch of idiot people, they should just be fired. |
lol, the meta guy is on twitter, and he is flat out refusing to take down that review. Pathetic site
Livewire said:
lol, the meta guy is on twitter, and he is flat out refusing to take down that review. Pathetic site |
link? The article isn't even scored.... this is really odd.
Never mind I found it. Thats really odd. Metacritic is supposed to be for actual critics...
Metacritic trying to kill their réputation by counting a troll review or are they trolling themselves ?
Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:
PS4: 17m XB1: 10m WiiU: 10m Vita: 10m
Aerys said: Metacritic trying to kill their réputation by counting a troll review or are they trolling themselves ? |
When asked about the AP review, they said they only track staff reviews but this guy isn't on their staff. I think its one of those situations where someone fucked up but is too embarassed to go back and fixed it out of pride.
Yep both are AP reviews but somehow hé managés to take the trolling one
Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:
PS4: 17m XB1: 10m WiiU: 10m Vita: 10m
I know it's a satire troll review but it's still being counted and the score is 93. What did the great visionary Kerotan say? Meta 93.
People say I'm lucky. And thet I am. But guess fucking what, I make my own luck. thank God for me.