By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Uncharted 4: A Thief's End Review Thread - MC: 93 / GR: 92.70%

Tagged games:

Aerys on 12 May 2016
Boutros said:
poklane said:

Metacritic has dropped to 93

http://www.nooooooooooooooo.com/

EDIT: WASHINGTON POST GAVE THE GAME A 4/10 GET THE FUCK OUT

I'm really confused. Washington Post already reviewed the game and praised it and gave it 4/4.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/review-uncharted-4-finds-brotherly-love-amid-spectacle/2016/05/11/f76beb2a-1773-11e6-971a-dadf9ab18869_story.html

Why would Metacritic take the other one?

 

 

Unexpected review, this guy will be praised by his boss this month for all thé readers hé brought.



Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:

 PS4: 17m   XB1: 10m    WiiU: 10m   Vita: 10m

 

Around the Network
Teeqoz on 12 May 2016

What a garbage review by Washington Post.



Ballas on 12 May 2016
Mentore said:

down to 93 lmao

and fanboys are still pulling down the user score to low 70s

Gamers are the worst community in the entertainment industry. Such hatred for such miniscule things as a plastic box, that's why others call them kids because they behave childishly. They should be promoting gaming but instead they attack each other and games not on their platform and attack other platforms, it sucks when developers put their efforts in a game only for it to be trashed by people who didn't and will never play it.

I'm not saying the negative user scores are wrong and the positive ones are right, but I'd expect more of them on the positive than negative side because the series has always been objectively good and I don't think this one could be that much worse as I haven't played it.



poklane on 12 May 2016

Yeah, the guy is a troll http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelthomsen/2014/11/28/wii-u-was-a-better-console-for-third-party-games/#77a3a47b79d5
Hopefully Metacritic will pull the review from their website soon.



Namiirei on 12 May 2016

Wait, wy metacritics take this review who is under the "humor" section, and not the real one ?



Around the Network
CosmicSex on 12 May 2016
poklane said:
Yeah, the guy is a troll http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelthomsen/2014/11/28/wii-u-was-a-better-console-for-third-party-games/#77a3a47b79d5
Hopefully Metacritic will pull the review from their website soon.

Oh damn.   What a fraud



CosmicSex on 12 May 2016

He says:

“A Thief’s End” is overflowing with useless detail. It overwhelms the eye with so many different points of focus that one almost clings to the over-the-shoulder focal point at the center of the screen, where the gun reticle can at least hint at a potential ways of engaging with all of the simulated objects and effects that are otherwise impossible to identify, let alone differentiate.

I... I don't even know whats wrong with him.... I think I hate him... as a person and I don't even know him.

Is he saying that there is so much detail that his eyes can't focus?  How does he walk down the street?



Neodegenerate on 12 May 2016
CosmicSex said:

He says:

“A Thief’s End” is overflowing with useless detail. It overwhelms the eye with so many different points of focus that one almost clings to the over-the-shoulder focal point at the center of the screen, where the gun reticle can at least hint at a potential ways of engaging with all of the simulated objects and effects that are otherwise impossible to identify, let alone differentiate.

I... I don't even know whats wrong with him.... I think I hate him... as a person and I don't even know him.

Is he saying that there is so much detail that his eyes can't focus?  How does he walk down the street?

The sad part is you bought into it and clicked.  Don't feed the trolls don't take the bait.



CosmicSex on 12 May 2016
Neodegenerate said:
CosmicSex said:

He says:

“A Thief’s End” is overflowing with useless detail. It overwhelms the eye with so many different points of focus that one almost clings to the over-the-shoulder focal point at the center of the screen, where the gun reticle can at least hint at a potential ways of engaging with all of the simulated objects and effects that are otherwise impossible to identify, let alone differentiate.

I... I don't even know whats wrong with him.... I think I hate him... as a person and I don't even know him.

Is he saying that there is so much detail that his eyes can't focus?  How does he walk down the street?

The sad part is you bought into it and clicked.  Don't feed the trolls don't take the bait.

I take it back... I got played.  Its a joke review.  It should be taken down from MC soon.  Wasn't supposed to be posted.  Its on their Cliffy Rocks page.  Not real guys



Aura7541 on 12 May 2016
poklane said:

Metacritic has dropped to 93

http://www.nooooooooooooooo.com/

EDIT: WASHINGTON POST'S MICHAEL THOMSEN GAVE THE GAME A 4/10 GET THE FUCK OUT https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/comic-riffs/wp/2016/05/12/uncharted-4-a-thiefs-end-review-this-four-part-series-should-have-ended-after-part-one/

Check the URL address. The article is under the Comic Riffs section, meaning that it's satire.