on 08 December 2015
which means XB1/NX are the most viable,as all ready stated, since its not console exclusive.
We have no idea what it means. Re-confirmed actual exclusives were also marked console debut as well. Why not just outright say exclusive?
Because it means "exclusivity is up in the air at this point" not "it won't be exclusive".
You did no such thing. Heck you claimed that EA doesn't count and just want to toss away random developer sources because you never provided a source. A random rumor about halo having a high digital attach rate does nothing to validate your claim. There are plenty of games on both consoles with high digital attach-rates. First it's a rumor and second GameStop (which I put more faith in than some unknown insiders reliability) said digital sales were inline with what you expect form AAA titles. I'm done with this conversation.
No. I claimed EA was ONE source and not all of them. I said what I did because the Halo rumor sort of drives the point home. Some pages later I provided the link to the source that inverts the attach rate of the chart you posted. You literally skipped not one, but TWO links because you couldn't be arsed to read them since they do not conform to your narrow views of gaming...
Whatever, you're just wasting my precious time anyways and I am not gaining much by explaining things to a wall... I swear it's the same kind of stuff I deal with on GFaqs...
I was going to make an historical comment, but it's awfully inappropriate and would rather keep it to myself...
It was Britain, it is America, tomorrow France and next year, the world...
Warning: This poster has a very negative opinion of Sony and Nintendo, Idea Factory and companies Tecmo Koei, EA, BioWare, Blizzard, Treyarch, Infinity Ward, Kadokawa and Sega. If you have very positive views of these and a negative view of Microsoft or Bethesda Game Studios, AVOID ENGAGEMENT AT ALL COSTS!