No, it says that people are looking for games developed for handheld ground up, not console ports like the majority of the Vita's games. People don't buy a handheld to play what they play at home on the go. They do it for a more digestable experience, one that Sony has not gotten right since the original PSP.

so youre basicly saying without these games you wouldnt play on the 3DS, that shows you arent interrested in handhelds if it werent for exclusives.

It wouldn't be a big slap in the face if the game look and feel like a next gen game.

lol what

It means that I want games made for handhelds on my handheld. It's something that almost everyone wants for handhelds. Not wanting straight up half backed console ports and indies as the primary games on my handheld means that I should get out of handhelds? If you say so. Personally, I'd rather have a game made for an easily digestable and portable experience like Pokemon or Fire Emblem Awakening on my handheld than a port of an indie game that plays better on home consoles anyways.

Handhelds should not be portable home consoles. They should be their own niche, something that Nintendo has known since the original Gameboy and something that Sony forgot after the PSP.

Well, honsetly, i'm also planning on getting a n3ds. but if sony decides to screw ps vita only owners further, then i'd be more than happy to sell both my vitas and be a n3ds only gamer.

I'm a huge Vita fan and would be just fine with that.

Thats your opinion but the sales numbers of both hanhelds are telling a different story that hanhelds are dieng, so nintendo isnt doing everything right and sony everything worse than nintendo.