how could you possibly rate 4 halo games in 1 box as a 60% game while there are reviewers giving AC:unity 100% fuckin hell...

Halo isn't Gods gift to gaming in the eye of everyone maybe?

But to take 4 90%+ games and stick them in a box for the price of one game while remaking one of the 4 games from the ground up and adding a massive online element to it... then give it 60% because the online element is so bad it takes away 30% per game from what the prev titles were worth as single titles? Makes no sense.

Worst HD collection ever.

87 now.

Because most people only want to play the multyplayer part of the game and even then the single player also has some bugs in it, even playing coop causes frare drops on all 4 games, so its not just the multyplayer being down.

And I have to agree with breedinbull here, there are better shooters if you want, theese games are dated already. they dont hold the same standard.

Suuuuuuure...

*of big AAA fanchise

Just because nowadays Activison can sink 50 million dollars in one game doesn't void the fact that, back then, this was AAA horror from Konami's masterminds.

*of big AAA franchise in these days defintion, that sells at least 3m+ each part

Happy now? :p