Forums - Microsoft Discussion - So ... That big third party rumoured exclusive for Xbox1.

Tagged games:

selnor1983 said:
It could be anything. Its supposed to be a megaton isnt it? MS could buy ninty and Sony hundreds of times over so money wouldnt be an issue.

We will see I guess, would be funny to see some meltdowns though.


They don't have the money you think they do. They're also probably moving back to core moneymakers as virtually all of their income is windows/office/servers. Everything else is either insignificant or a huge money loser. Shareholders are looking at Apple and asking for better management from Microsoft. It's why dildo finally got shown the door.



Around the Network
selnor1983 said:
It could be anything. Its supposed to be a megaton isnt it? MS could buy ninty and Sony hundreds of times over so money wouldnt be an issue

Do you really think Sony would not accidentally "spill the beans" if it were such a colossal megaton, hence killing the hype? After all, they are in constant talks with every game producer and pretty much know whatever game is on the way...

People really should back down from all the E3 hype. Brazil 2014 is approaching fast and absolutely nobody outside the USA is giving a sh"t about a local event there as long as football is on (and by football, we mean the real footall, not handegg)



selnor1983 said:
It could be anything. Its supposed to be a megaton isnt it? MS could buy ninty and Sony hundreds of times over so money wouldnt be an issue.

We will see I guess, would be funny to see some meltdowns though.

Yeah because I'm sure Phil Spencer has access to unlimited funds. 



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!

Arkaign said:
selnor1983 said:
It could be anything. Its supposed to be a megaton isnt it? MS could buy ninty and Sony hundreds of times over so money wouldnt be an issue.

We will see I guess, would be funny to see some meltdowns though.


They don't have the money you think they do. They're also probably moving back to core moneymakers as virtually all of their income is windows/office/servers. Everything else is either insignificant or a huge money loser. Shareholders are looking at Apple and asking for better management from Microsoft. It's why dildo finally got shown the door.


Youir arrticle about MS Xbox 3 billion loss is so heavily wrong. The losses Xbox has had is due to first Xbox and RROD on 360. 

Over the last 5 years MS has reported in Xbox division a profit every single quater. MS also reprted at the last quater a PROFIT. 

And actually MS do have that much money. They just made over $7 billion profit in the last quater financials as a company. A revenue of $24.5 billion. Sony is worhth less than MS revenue in 1 quater.



selnor1983 said:
It could be anything. Its supposed to be a megaton isnt it? MS could buy ninty and Sony hundreds of times over so money wouldnt be an issue.

We will see I guess, would be funny to see some meltdowns though.

At the end, Microsoft is still a business with only one main goal: making a profit. They wont just throw money at it for the heck of it, especially wit the Xbox Division being one of Microsoft's worst profit wise.



Around the Network
poklane said:
selnor1983 said:
It could be anything. Its supposed to be a megaton isnt it? MS could buy ninty and Sony hundreds of times over so money wouldnt be an issue.

We will see I guess, would be funny to see some meltdowns though.

At the end, Microsoft is still a business with only one main goal: making a profit. They wont just throw money at it for the heck of it, especially wit the Xbox Division being one of Microsoft's worst profit wise.

In thepast. Its the only gaming company to post a profit every quater for the last 5 years though. And value is based on current activity. Not long forgotten days of RROD and Xbox original.



selnor1983 said:
It could be anything. Its supposed to be a megaton isnt it? MS could buy ninty and Sony hundreds of times over so money wouldnt be an issue.

We will see I guess, would be funny to see some meltdowns though.

 

 

 



 

Beyond Good and Evil?

 

No Mans Sky?



We'll see in a week won't we. I'm not gonna make any assumptions on this one



fleischr said:
Xxain said:
fleischr said:
Xxain said:
The Japanese exclusive is Devil's Third.


No. Devil's Third is probably going to be the other 'large-scale' collaboration Nintendo and Tecmo-Koei have on WiiU.


If your being sarcastic, I missed it. Devil's Third is in development at Valhalla Games, Itagaki's(Ninja Gaiden, DoA) company, wheres its been for like 4 years. So unless I missed something...

The Japanese exclusive thing and Itagaki's broken silence appeared in same time frame.

Itagaki was previously affiliated with Tecmo-Koei. Once THQ was dropped as the publisher, it'd make sense for Tecmo-Koei to take interest in his project.

The game was built with the Darksiders 2 engine -- which hasn't been known to run on X1, but has been used on the WiiU. WiiU was confirmed as one of the platforms for the game when the game was first developed.

If you're a small company, you don't retool a game you've practically finished for a platform you never targeted in the first place. You don't go experimenting with an engine unless you have serious cash and time to do that.


What kind nonsense is this? You do know that Itagaki and Tecmo did not part on good terms right? There is no friendly relationship there. Based on that situation it Wouldn't make sense for EITHER party to interested in each other. Not to mention DT ran on the Darksiders engine while it was being funded by THQ. When it was dropped finacing was picked up by some Korean company with added funding by Itagaki and close team members (according to him he and few sold their own homes). Last update from him before his long hibernation was that were doing a completly new engine for newest gen but lets say they were still using darksiders engine... Why would that somehow be a end all land on other consolse? They can be retooled to take advantage of other consoles. MS picking them up definitely gives them the cash and it certainly makes more sense based on relationship.