I think so.

it happend at gamescom, they retracted it the next day and said that person had spoke out of line,  it had to do with HUMA,   ill see if i can find a link

http://www.psu.com/a020686/PS4-huMA-architecture--AMD-retracts-statement-will-not-comment-on-PS4-vs-Xbox-One?page=0

sorry its a Sony link, it was just first one i found,  it has the facts of what happend and its easy to ignore the last paragraph saying its a tongue slip lol thats for us to believe ;)

That seems to be a bit of paraphrasing and interpretation. Reading the original article http://www.psu.com/a020650/PS4-has-huMA-Xbox-One-doesnt-3D-performance-way-better-apparently has some interpretation as well.

I believe the original source from where it started was a german article, so with translation im not surprised if alot of paraphrasing and enterpretation has happend.   with the debate of huMA  still going on its hard to really bring that into this arguement.  I think MS has something like it, they just call it something else.

Just wanted to provide that link :)

lol "okay" :) Really that statement and a quick look at your post history is already destroying all your credibility!
Also I'm not sure if you actually read the artile (my guess is not) but this guy never compared the PS4 to the Xbox One...
Do you feel insecure to the point of having to convince yourself or us that the PS4 is more powerful?

Sure thanks, but it still seems to be putting words into AMD's mouth. For instance: http://www.tomshardware.com/news/xbox-one-processor-jaguar-apu-huma,24035.html

Anyway getting back on thread, I believe the point being made by these MS folks is to counteract the outlandish claims of some arbitrary number: such as 50% more CU translates into 50% more powerful and so forth. I see this one bandied around a lot, and while it's clear that the PS4 has some good numbers, the actual performance difference will not be as big as it's made out to be.

Thanx i hadn't seen that where is specifically says huMA,  just the reddit guy talking about something similar but was confused by the term huMA. I guess debate closed, im out of the loop.

50% more power is so hard to define as well..  i highly doubt we will see FPS differences of 15-20.   but what if the PS4 can do a much better picture, how do you define how nice something looks and then give it a numerical value compared to something else.   we are never going to know an exact number lol which means this bickering wont end! MWUAHAHAHA

FWIW I forsee the ongoing difference will be along the lines of the current gen, requiring digital foundry/lens of truth A/B static comparisons and nitpicks to see any real difference. Exclusives will continue to be programmed to the strengths of the hardware but even then it appears the differences aren't so big.

No, its more like a 500 hp mustang gt vs a 450 hp corvette. Sure the mustang will win in a straight line, but put it on a track with bends and it loses.

Pc gamers know it's never as simple as just numbers, which is why no one gives a shit except console fanboys. The only metric that matters in the end is frames per second between the two with comparable image quality. Wait till the games and the benchmarks come out then we'll have something to talk about.